These 3 pictures may provide hints as to what is going on:
https://media.nationalpriorities.org/uploads/dis%2C_mand%2C_int_pie_2015_enacted.png
https://media.nationalpriorities.org/uploads/mandatory_spending_pie%2C__2015_enacted.png
For those who wanted to "give Trump a chance" it seems he is out of
chances already :
For those finding it difficult to keep up - here's a run down of the
week so far To recap:
* On January 19th, 2017, DT said that he would cut funding for the DOJ's
Violence Against Women programs.
* On January
However, it seems that less revenue will go to dead bodies industries,
so it's progress after all.
--tax money will be stolen to pay for enterprising on HSA, vouchers for
schools, etc.
# distributed via : no commercial use without permission
#is a moderated mailing list for net
On Jan 31, 2017, at 14:18 , Alexander Bard wrote:
> But is there somehow a widespread agreement that economic growth in
> China and India over the last 30 years has not benefitted the masses at
> all? That this is merely a "neo-liberal myth"?
"Polls show that about
When I saw the "10 Preliminary Theses on Trump", what made me feel uneasy was,
mostly, a matter of form: that the "10 Theses" format seemed strangely
anachronistic, inadequate for a phenomenon like Trump, and that of all the
attributes one could have possibly picked, "preliminary" looked like
Hello Brian,
I understand the criticism very well (it's one that's been made quite
often by various groups, especially during the 2011 wave of struggles,
as I'm sure you're well aware), but I also think that we have for a
good while now been without clear or obvious ways forward
There is one hypothesis that the various "this can all not be
true"-pieces are ignoring: It might as well be that the "trait"-based
social media manipulation techniques work best if applied to dissuade
people from going to vote, but make little difference when applied with
the goal of encouraging
On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 09:43:28PM +0100, André Rebentisch wrote:
> The more common match term for "protocol power" as coined by the
> abstract seems to be the anglo-saxon "multistakeholderism" governance
> model. It is deeply embedded in their political culture. I assume it
> stems from a more
<
http://littleatoms.com/news-science/donald-trump-didnt-win-election-through-facebook
>
The myth that British data scientists won the election for Trump
By Martin Robbins
30/01/2017
Claims that social media data won the presidency are greatly exaggerated
A piece of data science mythology
On 2017-01-31 01:15, sebast...@rolux.org wrote: >January 30, Time To Wake Up
>"The media always has taken Trump literally. It never takes him
>seriously." (Peter Thiel)
>
>What is beginning to dawn upon Americans is that the exact opposite is true:
>That by taking
>Trump seriously, they
Excellent points, dear Brian, and much agreed too.
But is there somehow a widespread agreement that economic growth in
China and India over the last 30 years has not benefitted the masses at
all? That this is merely a "neo-liberal myth"? Sure we have seen enough
Indian and Chinese
Morlock,
You are right - it is a bone - an inside justification, along "social"
and "religious" lines --(moral) for those also setting up the
free-market...
However, even the "free" market does not exist in a moral and political
vacuum so while there is too-down rearrangement of hierarchical
On 01/31/2017 09:38 AM, Ian Alan Paul wrote:
To not know
precisely where we are headed is to remain open to the possibility of
arriving where we couldn�t possibly have planned to, and in refusing
the present we also invite what cannot presently exist within it.
The refusal to
I admit to being slightly mystified by what you say, Felix. Let's start
with protocols. An example used decades ago in discussions of
artificial intelligence was the protocol for restaurant dining: you go
in the door, wait to be seated, are shown to table, sit down, examine
the menu
14 matches
Mail list logo