[sorry, delayed by flaky mods...]
What a crap - this implicates that only rapists (your words) can
produce = privacy tools and rides on the overcome patriarchal
narrative that creative/ = technological progress has been achieved
by single heroic individuals whose brilliant brains have grown = in
[Sorry, delayed by flaky mods]
On 15/Jun/16 03:19, Zenaan Harkness wrote:
This means, that the cost to implement a "new community with new rules",
in terms of education and effort, is not far off zero (at least for those
with a Western schooling).
Hmmm, this is a bit like saying "virtual
The simple question is: do privacy tools need to have rapist-free origin?
If the answer is positive, and the kosher tool origin is in (for the
politically correct change of the world, unmarred by questionable
characters), then we will not have non-corporate suppliers of privacy
tools. See how
In the spirit of nettime, I took the time to add thoughts to several
of the past contributions.
On 06/12/2016 10:41 PM, Gabriella "Biella" Coleman wrote:
>I certainly like this statement and think it has some valuable
>insights: [1]https://jacobian.org/writing/assholes/
Yes, by creating
> I think it is important to talk about what could have been done
> differently but I don't buy into this argument. There are plenty of
> institutions and organizations in hackerdom that are structured from
> many free software projects (including Tor) to the Pirate Parties to the
> CCC. Jake was
On 10/06/16 20:42, biella wrote:
> The social movement as a whole, like most social movements, are hard to
> structur e (not sure I would want that anyway as social movements are by
> definition transve rsal to any one organization, group, or entity) but
> there are many important examples of
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 02:42:20PM -0400, biella wrote:
> I think it is important to talk about what could have been done
> differently but I don't buy into this argument. There are plenty of
> institutions and organizations in hackerdom that are structured from
> many free software projects
*As long as the, let's call it "hacktivist community", is a free
form unconstituted something, it is always subject to the rules of
the outside society: attention capitalism, spin doctor style
manipulation. Will we ever know if the ioerror drama was, even if
based on true human
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 01:07:59PM +0200, Patrice Riemens wrote:
> Making the rise of celebrities possible inevitably ensures the creation
> of a celebrity cult, itself the blueprint for individual failure. We
> should not have allowed ourselves to grow so big - as an aggregate. In
> my
