Sandra,
I was delighted to see your name after so long. I have to admit though, while
impressed with your zeal for compendiousness and classification, I did not get
much out of either of the pieces you posted.
Let me mention a couple of problems I had. In the first piece you cite the idea
Dear Sandra, Brian,
Thank you from me for your very clear and concise breakdown of Art in the
information economy, Sandra. A good read and interesting sets of research
from your own forays into aboriginal culture to innovation as a driver of
the economy. Very apt for this conversation coming out
On Sun, Mar 28, 2021 at 9:37 AM Sandra Braman
wrote:
> This piece from 1996 on art and various forms of capital in the digital
> world has some things to say that are pertinent to this interesting
> conversation. You'll see some theorists not as present in ongoing
> conversation these days as
To complete the trilogy, for this particular list at the conjunction of
art, technology, and politics, this piece on "tactical memory" discusses
how the right to create might affect what happens politically online.
http://people.tamu.edu/~braman/bramanpdfs/89_tacticalmemory.pdf
On Sun, Mar 28,
Thanks. Should also have sent along the companion piece, articulating a
"right to create" in the face of changing conditions. You'll find that text
here: http://people.tamu.edu/~braman/bramanpdfs/013_create.pdf.
On Sun, Mar 28, 2021 at 10:31 AM bronac ferran wrote:
> Thanks Sandra
> That is a
Thanks Sandra
That is a fascinating read and very much on topic.
B
On Sun, 28 Mar 2021 at 15:37, Sandra Braman wrote:
> This piece from 1996 on art and various forms of capital in the digital
> world has some things to say that are pertinent to this interesting
> conversation. You'll see some
