This is exactly the issue - the (assumed) need for interpretation.
If there is a small number of potential interpreters who really
understand issues (1 in 1000?), and even smaller number among those who
are willing to interpret to the public for altruistic reasons (1 in
1,000,000?), then it
Reply to Hackers can't solve Surveillance
Original at:
https://lists.puscii.nl/wws/arc/uncivilization/2015-01/msg7.html
Dmitry Kleiner wrote that hackers *alone* can not solve surveillance:
http://www.dmytri.info/hackers-cant-solve-surveillance/
I would go further, and say that hackers
Good points Dmytri Morlockelloi--
The nature of political challenges has changed *due* to the technology, and
there is no way to enroll the unwashed into the action without understanding the
said technology.
It is clear that the feedback loops between what people do in life and what
comes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/01/15 07:55 PM, morlockel...@yahoo.com wrote:
no amount of 20th century politics will solve this.
Well, 19th Century...
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJUqKZaAAoJECciMUAZd2dZj/IIALHSKNEuxGJ1sx1sG+0nhwBj
The nature of political challenges has changed *due* to the
technology, and there is no way to enroll the unwashed into the action
without understanding the said technology.
In 19th and 20th century it was relatively easy to explain issues and
causes - the rich get all the pussy and power,
