On Tue, Jan 31, 2017 at 09:43:28PM +0100, André Rebentisch wrote:
> The more common match term for "protocol power" as coined by the
> abstract seems to be the anglo-saxon "multistakeholderism" governance
> model. It is deeply embedded in their political culture. I assume it
> stems from a more
I admit to being slightly mystified by what you say, Felix. Let's start
with protocols. An example used decades ago in discussions of
artificial intelligence was the protocol for restaurant dining: you go
in the door, wait to be seated, are shown to table, sit down, examine
the menu
On 01.02.2017 02:16, Michael Gurstein wrote:
> In fact, I believe that "protocol power" is the precise opposite of
> multistakeholderism where MSism is always and necessarily ad hoc, temporary,
> localized and where "showing up" (with the resources and staying power to
> keep showing up) is the
un...@mail.kein.org] On Behalf Of André Rebentisch
Sent: January 31, 2017 12:43 PM
To: nettim...@kein.org
Subject: Re: Protocols and Crises
The more common match term for "protocol power" as coined by the abstract
seems to be the anglo-saxon "multistakeholderism" governan
The more common match term for "protocol power" as coined by the
abstract seems to be the anglo-saxon "multistakeholderism" governance
model. It is deeply embedded in their political culture. I assume it
stems from a more corporatist past.
/A
Am 31.01.2017 um 06:58 schrieb Morlock Elloi:
>
Isn't the primary (and only?) purpose of these protocols to reduce the
number of protocoliriat (TM) (the number of people involved), and
simplify the control?
Most people understand cash. Few understand derivatives. Almost no one
understands sh*t about Bitcoin. The control pyramid
Looks promising, Felix. An abstract should be abstract and this one is
not confused, just sometimes elliptical,
Some notes:
The three types of power (hard, soft, neo-liberal) seem to be discrete
categories, but don't their inter-relationships blur those boundaries?
The contrast
and I'm not even sure if the argument really works, but
it's perhaps a start Felix]
*Protocols and Crises*
During the 1990s much has been made of the role of soft power, that is,
the power to shape experience, desires and goals through attraction,
persuasion and co-optation. Culture
