despite I would share amost all of the general goals of DiEM25, there
are some remarkable procedural inconsistencies:
- intransparency: how can you criticize the compositon of EU-closed
meetings and apply the very same practice with a totally intransparent
selection process for the core
could it be, that it's a kind of hoax?
Like: two bubbles trying trying to keep each other up by leaning against
one another: a fragile bitcoin market on the one side and a
dysfunctional art market on the other side.
with the simple idea idea to create those crazy prices and to to lure
luring
why not cutting stuff short:
the war is going brilliantly. 3 goals have alread been achieved
1) keep the Russians out
2) the Americans in
3) the Germans down.
(Lord Ismay)
Now, please: harshest sanctions ever, in order to also reach the last goal:
4) Fuck the EU! (Nuland)
Mission almost
bcs it's most likely a British secret service related fakenews
pseudo-activist astroturf propaganda site, sponsored by the integrity
intiative:
here a bunch of links, of which Craig Murray is the most credible
source, the others to be taken with a grain of salt:
add this: Former senior advisor the Secretary of Defense Col. Doug
Macgregor on the situation in Ukraine and Washington:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NFngc_8RiVc
Am 16.03.2022 um 09:08 schrieb Geert Lovink:
Compiled for/by INC Ukraine page and more tech meets tactical media
initiatives
careful about whom and what to support.
s
Am 16.03.2022 um 12:05 schrieb Ted Byfield:
On 16 Mar 2022, at 4:45, Stefan Heidenreich wrote:
add this: Former senior advisor the Secretary of Defense Col. Doug Macgregor on
the situation in Ukraine and Washington:
It seems strange to see
Re: Irregular Ukraine Linklist (Ted Byfield)
2. Re: Irregular Ukraine Linklist (Stefan Heidenreich)
3. More Ukraine links (Michael Benson)
-- Forwarded message --
From: Ted Byfield mailto:tedbyfi...@gmail.com>>
To: nettime-l@mail.kein.org <mailto:net
,
Ted
On Mar 17, 2022, 18:26 -0400, Stefan Heidenreich
, wrote:
it's a double bind + cognitive dissonance problem:
for most western intellectuals, after years of fighting for the right
causes (which I also supported and keep supporting) it is very difficult
to realize that one has
bcs we shouldn't (care about it)
my impression is that the current ruins Eurasian modell give a noisy
echo of old Mackinder / Mahan / Spykman ideas, plus a Schmittian
worldwiew. Old times: different technology, different media, different
military. Maybe it still prevails in the
Science thrives with doubts and diversity. And ends with apodictic calls
to stop discussions.
Sorry to say, Florian: your statement sounds to me like an attempt to
block a very much needed debate. The comparison with intelligent design
is itself a propagandistic trope. Even being "provax", I'd
Hi Pit,
with the thread firmly back in the closet, I thought to give a second
look at your text.
Let me try to better point out the Schmittian fallcy: it looks at the
situation assuming the wrong actors, as in realist 'nations'. Parts of
the world operate indeed 'post-westphalian' - but not
Black Soil
white money
... a short summer of the end of the history of
(neoliberal) globalisation, mediated, of course, by the rise of the
Internet.
to be followed by an ugly autumn of global warming, pandemic
profiteering, reactionary autocrats challenging the liberal white
oligarch
oh yes: we're being prepared to see China rise and shine as the next big
enemy. You can bet on "Chinagate" coming soon :)
but: that's exactly how far the Schmittian aproach holds. No inch
further. Let's face it: the reference to Schmitt builds an intellectual
phantasy with very little
Hi Brian,
thank you so much for this very reasonable request for comments. I've
had already written off nettime (as "NATO-shit-list" .. as one
participant used to frame it).
Your bleak view looks very likely, but it's not the only possible
outcome. So, against all odds, let me sketch a
- the defeat of NATO could lead to a "decolonization" of Western
Europe (not that this by itself leads to positive results. Repressive
"liberal" fascism remains as likely an outcome as some sort of
independence.)
Oh my, what this is supposed to mean, only chatGPT can explain.
well, people
t mutually exclusive, most wars of independence were both
struggles for self determination and proxy wars between the great powers,
there are always many wars within each war...
Oh my, what this is supposed to mean, only chatGPT can explain
fies aber lustig
x Ana
On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 6:00 P
in the US security apparatus see it also as a proxy-war, but I think
also Biden's theme of democracy-vs-authoritarianism plays a role. I
don't think it's a given that a republican administration under Trump
would have done the same (even if some in the military would still
ha
I invite Stefan to explain what he suggests we should do instead.
nothing.
Let people make their own judgement and cite whomever they want to cite.
Best
Stefan
# distributed via : no commercial use without permission
#is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
# collaborative text
lectual and activist heir
of Sophie Scholl?
Cite whomever they want to cite.
m
On 14 Feb 2023, at 13:32, José María Mateos wrote:
On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 01:21:54PM +0100, Stefan Heidenreich wrote:
I invite Stefan to explain what he suggests we should do instead.
nothing.
Let people
Hi Felix,
there is a problem in your analysis: your framing is only one amongst
many others, equally possible.
For example, from the viewpoint of the realist school (Mearsheimer) or
the geo-economic perspective (M. Hudson) the situation looks very
different. Let me sketch it briefly:
Well,
Funny, that mail sounds in tone and attitude to me like something I've
encountered last time in the Berlin Stasi-archive.
The censor has spoken ...
s
Am 14.02.23 um 17:07 schrieb Ted Byfield:
On 14 Feb 2023, at 4:48, Michael Guggenheim wrote:
I sent an email to NLR alerting them to this
21 matches
Mail list logo
