On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 10:16 -0500, Carl Karsten wrote:
Sounds like it would be good to just disable the switch, right? From
what I gather, the switch signals the OS, which then runs code to
disable the wifi hardware, so overriding that is very possible.
Depends on the machine. On some
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 10:04 AM, Simon Geard delga...@ihug.co.nz wrote:
On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 10:16 -0500, Carl Karsten wrote:
Sounds like it would be good to just disable the switch, right? From
what I gather, the switch signals the OS, which then runs code to
disable the wifi hardware,
Hi Cedric,
On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 10:16 -0500, Carl Karsten wrote:
Sounds like it would be good to just disable the switch,
right? From
what I gather, the switch signals the OS, which then runs
code to
disable the wifi hardware, so
--On Thursday, July 23, 2009 15:04:13 -0400 Dan Williams d...@redhat.com
wrote:
¦
¦ Yeah, reconnect of a failed connection (as opposed to a
¦ user-disconnected one) is definitely on the list. I was planning on
¦ doing some of the work for that in the 'inhibit' branch in git, so you
¦ can track
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
U guys have got to be kidding! (I mean it in a good way!)
I just signed up to see if this was on track or if i can help with
something.
I have the code (from the anon git source) building nicely and was just
about to start hacking.
Is there any
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I guess i emailed before reading up in the bugzilla...
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=349151
+1 for the dial this connection first as well.
Rick Jones wrote:
| --On Thursday, July 23, 2009 15:04:13 -0400 Dan Williams
d...@redhat.com
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 7:40 AM, Marc Herbert marc.herb...@gmail.com wrote:
Rodney Morris a écrit :
Below is my nm-system-settings.conf:
[main]
plugins=ifcfg-rh, keyfile
Thanks in advance for any help in resolving this mystery,
Have you tried to reproduce with just ifcfg-rh and
