nm-applet and Sugar -- control conflict over d-bus

2010-12-13 Thread Martin Langhoff
Hi list, we're working on some issues in how we handle the network between Sugar and Gnome sessions, and we're finding something unexpected. If we disable networking (sleep) from nm-applet , we cannot wake NM up from Sugar, and vice-versa. Easier to test: if we're in a Gnome session, if we put

Re: nm-applet and Sugar -- control conflict over d-bus

2010-12-13 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Martin Langhoff martin.langh...@gmail.com wrote: Easier to test: if we're in a Gnome session, if we put NM to sleep from nm-applet, we cannot wake it up from cnetworkmanager. This is on F11, NM 0.7. Also repros on F14 fully updated. m --  martin.langh

Re: nm-applet and Sugar -- control conflict over d-bus

2010-12-14 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 6:44 AM, Jirka Klimes jkli...@redhat.com wrote: Enable networking in nm-applet and other user programs should use new method Enable instead of Sleep. Spot on. That's what's happening also on our F11 builds. However, cnetworkmanager is not updated and still uses Sleep

Status of NM managing rfkill?

2011-01-20 Thread Martin Langhoff
Hi Dan, list Back in Feb 2010, there was mention of NM learning to use rfkill when it brings down a wlan device. Has that happened, or is it likely to happen? I am thinking of http://mail.gnome.org/archives/networkmanager-list/2010-February/msg00185.html Some background to the question... On our

Re: Activation (wlan1/wireless): association took too long

2011-11-08 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 2:14 PM, Dan Williams d...@redhat.com wrote: where reason #4 means disconnected due to inactivity, which could mean that the driver for your device isn't correctly handing power save and thus the AP thinks your device is gone and deauthenticates it.  That's even before

Re: Fedora16 - Brain dead wireless network manager

2012-01-17 Thread Martin Langhoff
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote: But it does not address the removal of information from the UI nor the control over SSID selection/control. Agreed. NM-client on F15 and now F16 is a perceptible downgrade over F14. The brave new world of Gnome 3 has

openvpn cmdline communication to NM

2016-06-13 Thread Martin Langhoff
dbus msg? thank you, m -- martin.langh...@gmail.com - ask interesting questions ~ http://linkedin.com/in/martinlanghoff - don't be distracted~ http://github.com/martin-langhoff by shiny stuff ___ networkmanager-list mailing list

Re: openvpn cmdline communication to NM

2016-06-14 Thread Martin Langhoff
hal...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Mon, 2016-06-13 at 12:46 -0400, Martin Langhoff wrote: >> Hi List! >> >> is there a practical way to get openvpn commandline to talk to NM to >> have NM update resolv.conf with the DNS settings coming from the VPN >> endpoint? >> &g

Re: openvpn cmdline communication to NM

2016-06-14 Thread Martin Langhoff
ps it helps diagnosis... cheers, m -- martin.langh...@gmail.com - ask interesting questions ~ http://linkedin.com/in/martinlanghoff - don't be distracted~ http://github.com/martin-langhoff by shiny stuff ___ networkmanager-list mailin

Re: openvpn cmdline communication to NM

2016-06-14 Thread Martin Langhoff
nd affection for NM and dev team. There's been huge progress and many things Just Work; and that's amazing. cheers. m -- martin.langh...@gmail.com - ask interesting questions ~ http://linkedin.com/in/martinlanghoff - don't be distracted~ http://github.com/martin-langhoff by