Hi Bojan,
Thanks for your feedback.
On 20/8/12 8:47 PM, Bojan Zdrnja (SANS ISC) wrote:
Hi Peter,
snip
Sounds pretty cool - I think that option number 2) would be better as
well since it's more flexible and allows for better expansions in the
future, especially if we're building stuff on
Hi Thomas,
Thanks for your feedback.
On 21/8/12 1:30 PM, Tomas Podermanski wrote:
Hi Peter,
snip
Definitely the second one - today, flexibility more important than
storage and performance.
Well - storage means I/O and performance is still a main goal of
nfdump. Therefore I still try to
On 21/8/12 9:20 PM, Bojan Zdrnja (SANS ISC) wrote:
Hi Peter,
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Peter Haag ph...@users.sourceforge.net
wrote:
Hi Bojan,
Thanks for your feedback.
You're welcome :)
- add statistics calculation per time as well (for example, per
second). It would be nice
