Hi there,
I'm wondering how the scenario below can be mapped through NH. It's a legacy
entity structure.
public class Customer
{
public Address HomeAddress {get;set;}
public Address WorkAddress {get; set;}
public Address BillingAddress {get;set;}
}
Unfortunately, it's also mapped
discriminator column, then subclass Address for the
various types.
Perhaps there's a better way, but that should work.
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 8:36 PM, Hendry Luk hendrym...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there,
I'm wondering how the scenario below can be mapped through NH. It's a
legacy entity structure
I also bumped into this problem (non-case-sensitive String.Contains() is a
really common requirement), and still looking for a solution for this..
which apparently still produces the same exception in the recent release of
NH-Linq. Any idea?
Thanks
On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Bryan Murphy
, regarding to string.contains.
Tuna Toksöz
Eternal sunshine of the open source mind.
http://devlicio.us/blogs/tuna_toksoz
http://tunatoksoz.com
http://twitter.com/tehlike
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 10:25 AM, Hendry Luk hendrym...@gmail.com wrote:
I also bumped into this problem (non-case
Sorry, no joy.. Still exact same exception..
Cheers
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 5:35 PM, Tuna Toksoz tehl...@gmail.com wrote:
can you retry your query like this:
string emailAddress=his.EmailAddress.ToLower();
from u in session.LinqUser()
where u.EmailAddress.ToLower() == emailAddress
select
that accepts
StringComparison parameter.
Cheers
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 6:01 PM, Hendry Luk hendrym...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry, no joy.. Still exact same exception..
Cheers
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 5:35 PM, Tuna Toksoz tehl...@gmail.com wrote:
can you retry your query like this:
string
Does anyone know any? I joined java-hibern...@googlegroups.com, but the only
activities it has ever had seems to be its continous flow of job vacancy
spams. There's no sign of humans life, unless they're all hibernating (pun
clearly intended), and obviously there's no response to the question I
Just wondering if that's still not supported, and if there's a plan for NH
to support that scenario. I really think it should be.
Cheers
Hendry
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
nhusers group.
To post to this group, send email to
Just found a post from a couple months back that it's not supposed to be
supported.
Any reason why?
Isn't it quite easy to implement?
delete from child_table where id not in (select child_id from parent_table)?
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Hendry Luk hendrym...@gmail.com wrote:
Just
Hello,
Has anyone tried Map (dictionary) element on NH3x?
I haven't tried with NH2, but the following hbm file is rejected by
NHibernate due to xsd validation (which shouldnt be. The hbm is validated
successfully against the xsd within visual-studio).
The hbm mapping file looks like this.
class
I think this is asked very frequently (including by me, just a couple weeks
ago), and very little reply, but it's safe to say that it's still unsuported
till date, and possibly will never be.
Currently the workaround I use has always been mapping to a one-to-many
private list field, and have your
empty space
(but it evidently wasn't).
On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 2:53 PM, Hendry Luk hendrym...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Has anyone tried Map (dictionary) element on NH3x?
I haven't tried with NH2, but the following hbm file is rejected by
NHibernate due to xsd validation (which shouldnt be. The hbm
Hello,
Is there any way to make one-many bag association from an entity to a
subclass (with join)?
Just an isolated example:
class name=Person
!-- blah blah --
discriminator column=PersonType /
/class
subclass name=Employee discriminator-value=Employee
!-- blah blah --
join table=Emplooyee
key
, 2010 at 8:45 PM, Hendry Luk hendrym...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Is there any way to make one-many bag association from an entity to a
subclass (with join)?
Just an isolated example:
class name=Person
!-- blah blah --
discriminator column=PersonType /
/class
subclass name=Employee
, Dec 2, 2010 at 6:45 AM, Hendry Luk hendrym...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
Is there any way to make one-many bag association from an entity to a
subclass (with join)?
Just an isolated example:
class name=Person
!-- blah blah --
discriminator column=PersonType /
/class
subclass name=Employee
at 12:01 AM, Fabio Maulo fabioma...@gmail.com wrote:
why not joined-subclass ?
On Thu, Dec 2, 2010 at 7:20 PM, Hendry Luk hendrym...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, in this case, because Employee has association to Company, and also
other properties. Is there any other way to achieve that other than
Hello,
How does one go about reporting a new bug in NH jira?
I encountered the following issue.
?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8 ?
hibernate-mapping xmlns=urn:nhibernate-mapping-2.2
assembly=MyDomain
namespace=MyDomain.Model
I was under impression that you certainly don't. No-proxy means that your
owner-entity's property will directly hit the DB and return your actual
associated entity as soon as you access the getter, instead of returning the
proxy of the associated-entity.
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 2:29 AM, Aaron
/en/index.html#mapping-declaration-onetoone
you need to use generator class=foreign on UserProfile id as described
there.
2011/1/7 Hendry Luk hendrym...@gmail.com
Hello,
How does one go about reporting a new bug in NH jira?
I encountered the following issue.
?xml version=1.0 encoding=utf-8
the composite id and you are wrong about using a
many to one. You DONT have many profiles for a user, you have only
one, thus it is a one-to-one association (by pk) perfectly supported
by nhibernate.
Composite ids are composite, it is not right having one column.
2011/1/8, Hendry Luk hendrym
.
2011/1/8, Hendry Luk hendrym...@gmail.com:
That's because composite-id is the only way to make many-to-one
association
on your ID. There's no other way.
You are allowed to have one or more properties as your composite-id. So
one
property is completely a valid mapping.
What's invalid here
Which brings me to this question:
Is there any way to have association as your primary key?
E.g. something that allows you to say session.Add(new UserProfile(user)),
and session.GetUserProfile(user)?
Cheers
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 11:02 AM, Hendry Luk hendrym...@gmail.com wrote:
## Errata
it.
2011/1/9 Hendry Luk hendrym...@gmail.com
Which brings me to this question:
Is there any way to have association as your primary key?
E.g. something that allows you to say session.Add(new UserProfile(user)),
and session.GetUserProfile(user)?
Cheers
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 11:02 AM
in place, and we were assuming that it would
be quite straightforward for NH to map this id as an association.
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Hendry Luk hendrym...@gmail.com wrote:
I forgot to mention that I dont have any association between user and
user.Profile. And by the way, UserProfile
Is there any plan for it to be supported?
Currently it throws LockMode.Force is currently not supported for generated
version properties.
I can't see any technical reason why NH can't do it. One way I can think NH
can do it is to issue the following sql:
update entity set id = id where
25 matches
Mail list logo
