[Nix-dev] Suspend in KDE broken

2010-05-20 Thread Eelco Dolstra
Hi, I noticed that sleep / suspend-to-RAM in KDE is broken. Running pm-suspend as root does work. This may be a PolicyKit/polkit (whatever it's called this week) problem, since dbus-send gives this error: [ee...@dutibo:~]$ dbus-send --system --print-reply \ --dest=org.freedesktop.Hal

[Nix-dev] gitFull broken on MacOS X (was: [PATCH] Fix git-send-email.)

2010-05-20 Thread Peter Simons
Hi, git-send-email depends on Net::SMTP and Net::SMTP::SSL. Make sendEmailSupport a config for git, and bring these libraries. Wrap the send-email script, or replace with a not supported script. despite several attempts, I didn't manage to build those Perl libraries on MacOS X, which means

Re: [Nix-dev] Suspend in KDE broken

2010-05-20 Thread roconnor
I'd like to also add that lock as never worked in KDE for me under nixos. On Thu, 20 May 2010, Eelco Dolstra wrote: Hi, I noticed that sleep / suspend-to-RAM in KDE is broken. Running pm-suspend as root does work. This may be a PolicyKit/polkit (whatever it's called this week) problem,

Re: [Nix-dev] Suspend in KDE broken

2010-05-20 Thread Tony White
On 20 May 2010 10:21, Eelco Dolstra e.dols...@tudelft.nl wrote: Hi, I noticed that sleep / suspend-to-RAM in KDE is broken.  Running pm-suspend as root does work.  This may be a PolicyKit/polkit (whatever it's called this week) problem, since dbus-send gives this error:

Re: [Nix-dev] Suspend in KDE broken

2010-05-20 Thread Eelco Dolstra
Hi, On 05/20/2010 01:56 PM, Tony White wrote: http://hal.freedesktop.org/docs/PolicyKit/tools-fileformats.html And it's called PolicyKit this week :) http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/PolicyKit polkit should go or be renamed. It is confusing. Right :-) According to this thread :

[Nix-dev] Re: Suspend in KDE broken

2010-05-20 Thread Yury G. Kudryashov
Eelco Dolstra wrote: Hi, On 05/20/2010 01:56 PM, Tony White wrote: http://hal.freedesktop.org/docs/PolicyKit/tools-fileformats.html And it's called PolicyKit this week :) http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/PolicyKit polkit should go or be renamed. It is confusing. Right :-) No.

Re: [Nix-dev] Suspend in KDE broken

2010-05-20 Thread Tony White
On 20 May 2010 13:03, Eelco Dolstra e.dols...@tudelft.nl wrote: Hi, On 05/20/2010 01:56 PM, Tony White wrote: http://hal.freedesktop.org/docs/PolicyKit/tools-fileformats.html And it's called PolicyKit this week :) http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/PolicyKit polkit should go or be

Re: [Nix-dev] gitFull broken on MacOS X (was: [PATCH] Fix git-send-email.)

2010-05-20 Thread David Brown
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 11:44:44AM +0200, Peter Simons wrote: despite several attempts, I didn't manage to build those Perl libraries on MacOS X, which means that Git is broken on that platform if sendEmailSupport is enabled. That situation is somewhat unsatisfactory. Does anyone have an idea

[Nix-dev] RE: [Nix-commits] SVN commit: nix - 21928 - eelco - in nixos/trunk: liblib/test-driver modules/virtualisation tests

2010-05-20 Thread Sander van der Burg - EWI
Very nice! But do you really have to use NAT in the testcase? I believe if the gateway is properly configured on the client and IP forwarding is turned on the router you're basically there, right? NAT will only let the server think that a connection from the client comes from router, but this

RE: [Nix-dev] RE: [Nix-commits] SVN commit: nix - 21928 - eelco - innixos/trunk: liblib/test-driver modules/virtualisation tests

2010-05-20 Thread Sander van der Burg - EWI
Hmmm, I probably was not entirely right about this, since the server also needs to know how to reach the client. NAT takes care of this, or the server also needs a default gateway pointing to the router :-) Maybe it's better for me to take some sleep now :-) -Oorspronkelijk bericht-

[Nix-dev] Re: [Nix-commits] SVN commit: nix - 21928 - eelco - in nixos/trunk: liblib/test-driver modules/virtualisation tests

2010-05-20 Thread Eelco Dolstra
Hi, On 05/20/2010 11:43 PM, Sander van der Burg - EWI wrote: Very nice! But do you really have to use NAT in the testcase? Given that this is a test for NAT it's essential :-) But no, it's not really needed: if you configure the outside machines to route the inside IP addresses to the

[Nix-dev] [PATCH] Handle too many links from btrfs.

2010-05-20 Thread David Brown
The btrfs seems to report too many links when attempting to rename the temp link. Handle this case in the same manner as generating too many links. --- src/libstore/optimise-store.cc | 14 +- 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git