For those that did not know him, there is this, and much more.
https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2468.txt
On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 2:15 PM Randy Bush wrote:
>
> 25 years ago, jon postel died. we stand on the shoulders of jon and
> others, a number of whom died in october. not a cheering month for
>
On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 12:07 PM le berger des photons via Nnagain
wrote:
>
> Dave, you seem interesting and awake and aware of the capacities of your own
> mind.
Not always! No one is.
>
> Mr. Chang, to whom you forwarded my message unfortunately for him has a
> closed mind, figures he
Dave, you seem interesting and awake and aware of the capacities of your
own mind.
Mr. Chang, to whom you forwarded my message unfortunately for him has a
closed mind, figures he knows it all and has seen it all.
And I can tell you that his attitude is based on the brainwashing he's
undergone
Good points all, Sebastien. How to "trade-off" a fixed capacity amongst many
users is ultimately a game theoretic problem when users are allowed to make
choices, which is certainly the case here. Secondly, any network that can and
does generate "more traffic" (aka overhead such as ACKs NACKs
We in semiconductors test TCP on hundreds of test rigs and multiple operating
systems, use statistical process controls before sending our chips, and support
sw to system integrators or device manufacturers. Then, those companies do
their work and test more before shipping to their customers.
Hi Richard,
> On Oct 16, 2023, at 19:01, Dick Roy via Nnagain
> wrote:
>
> Just an observation: ANY type of congestion control that changes application
> behavior in response to congestion, or predicted congestion (ENC), begs the
> question "How does throttling of application information
Starting with the users' view is good, but I think throughput is not the
only appropriate metric. If it was, we should possibly be converting
to an avian-based Internet:
https://spectrum.ieee.org/pigeonbased-feathernet-still-wingsdown-fastest-way-of-transferring-lots-of-data
Or perhaps
That Flakeway tool makes me think of an early version of the Chaos Monkey. To
that note, Apple maintains a developer tool called Network Link Conditioner
that does a good job simulating reduced network performance.
> On Oct 15, 2023, at 23:30, Jack Haverty via Nnagain
> wrote:
>
> Even back
Just an observation: ANY type of congestion control that changes application
behavior in response to congestion, or predicted congestion (ENC), begs the
question "How does throttling of application information exchange rate (aka
behavior) affect the user experience and will the user tolerate
Loon's ten years with backing from we don't know where doesn't compare well
with Sherwin's 50 years of constant success, billion dollar receipts
nearly all plowed back into the business with no expense spared for taking
proper care of the employees.
For me, the comparison ends with Loon
am I imagining it or have you also noticed that people who send
incrementally changed large files (think graphic artists) used to use
software to create an executable file which would turn the last version
into the new version using a small fraction of the bandwidth? And that
they now don't do
On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 12:11 AM le berger des photons via Nnagain
wrote:
>
> here is the best idea I've ever run into regarding getting artificial network
> connectivity (as opposed to the inborn network we have and have been
> programmed to ignore or had our pinneal glands poisoned) out to
On Sun, Oct 15, 2023 at 9:47 AM Dave Taht wrote:
> [...]
> The three forms of traffic I care most about are voip, gaming, and
> videoconferencing, which are rewarding to have at lower latencies.
> When I was a kid, we had switched phone networks, and while the sound
> quality was poorer than
>
> So for now, we'll keep paying for transit to get to the others (since it’s
> about as much as transporting IXP from Dallas), and hoping someone at
> Google finally sees Houston as more than a third rate city hanging off of
> Dallas. Or… someone finally brings a worthwhile IX to Houston that
here is the best idea I've ever run into regarding getting artificial
network connectivity (as opposed to the inborn network we have and have
been programmed to ignore or had our pinneal glands poisoned) out to
everybody regardless of how few or many neighbors they have:
Even back in 1978, I didn't think Source Quench would work. I recall
that I was trying to adapt my TCP2.5 Unix implementation to become TCP4,
and I asked what my TCP should do if it sent the first IP datagram to
open a TCP connection and received a Source Quench. It wasn't clear at
all how I
16 matches
Mail list logo
