When I introduced the VGV acronym, I used Gaming as the G, but that was
probably misleading. There are many "use cases" other than gaming. A
better term might be Interactive, and a VIV acronym.
Personally, I've been experimenting with "home automation", and have
found the cloud-based
I know this is a small side note but I felt compelled to speak up in defense of
online gaming. I’m not a gamer at all and up till a year or two ago, would have
agreed with Dick’s take about benefit to “society as a whole.” However, lately
I’ve started hearing some research on the benefits of
Yeah, I’m split on this. I do generally like the take of “laws for ISPs should
apply equally to all ISPs” but two valid and very different reasons immediately
came to mind for taking size into account.
1: Performance. I’ve supported some *very* backhaul constrained networks, and
you quickly
IMO the argument in seeking additional forbearance is that if all ISPs, no
matter the size, have a similar minimum burden of regulatory filing and
that burden is large, it acts as a barrier to entry. In a perfect world the
rules can apply to all sizes of ISPs *and* not be burdensome.
To keep this
While this article (How to Fix the Internet) is not explicitly about congestion
control, it is nonetheless about "congestion of a sort on the internet", and it
is definitely worth a read!
“Small Broadband Providers Urge FCC to Leave Them Out of Some Net Neutrality
Rules” See
https://broadbandbreakfast.com/2023/10/small-broadband-providers-urge-fcc-to-leave-them-out-of-some-net-neutrality-rules/.
My personal opinion is any rules should apply to all providers. After all, my
Hi Richard,
> On Oct 16, 2023, at 20:04, Dick Roy wrote:
>
> Good points all, Sebastien. How to "trade-off" a fixed capacity amongst many
> users is ultimately a game theoretic problem when users are allowed to make
> choices, which is certainly the case here. Secondly, any network that
