> First is the natural inclination of some large organizations to use
> regulatory language as a weapon, often twisting inadequately detailed
> expressions of intent around a Procrustean iron bed of regulatory definitions.
Many people expect to see the same. ;-)
JL
> That phrase "speed up" is too vague. Does it conflict with active or fair
> queue management?
No, I don’t think so. AQM is widely deployed to tens of millions of homes in
the US – I don’t think the FCC’s intent is to ban such an obviously beneficial
improvement in the internet. Rather, they
Hi Karl,
being a lawyer you know how this works, until a court come to an interpretation
all is in some degree of limbo, so if you want clarification sue somebody to
force an interpretation ;)
> On 15. May 2024, at 23:43, Karl Auerbach via Nnagain
> wrote:
>
> As a matter of drafting the
