Sebastian Moeller via Nnagain
> Sent: Monday, December 18, 2023 7:24 AM
> To: Network Neutrality is back! Let´s make the technical aspects heard this
> time!
> Cc: Sebastian Moeller; Ronan Pigott
> Subject: Re: [NNagain] Net neutrality and Bufferbloat?
>
> Hi Jason,
>
&g
m: Nnagain [mailto:nnagain-boun...@lists.bufferbloat.net] On Behalf Of
Sebastian Moeller via Nnagain
Sent: Monday, December 18, 2023 7:24 AM
To: Network Neutrality is back! Let´s make the technical aspects heard this
time!
Cc: Sebastian Moeller; Ronan Pigott
Subject: Re: [NNagain] Net neutrality and Buffer
Hi Jason,
during the Covid19 era, the EU issued clarifications that even throttling a
complete class like streaming video might be within reasonable network
management. The only stipulations wer this needs to happen only to allow
arguably more important traffic classes (like work-from home
> Misapplied concepts of network neutrality is one of the things that killed
> fq codel for DOCSIS 3.1
I am not so sure this was the case - I think it was just that a different AQM
was selected. DOCSIS 3.1 includes the DOCSIS-PIE AQM - see
https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8034.html and
Hey Dave,
That's good to hear. Thanks for the reply and thanks for the cake!
Cheers,
Ronan
___
Nnagain mailing list
Nnagain@lists.bufferbloat.net
https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/nnagain
On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 3:12 PM Ronan Pigott via Nnagain
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I read the recent NOI response and it sparked my interest in the relationship
> between Net Neutrality and bufferbloat. I also found [1] which makes it seem
> Net Neutrality is an obstacle to solving bufferbloat in the
Hi,
I read the recent NOI response and it sparked my interest in the relationship
between Net Neutrality and bufferbloat. I also found [1] which makes it seem
Net Neutrality is an obstacle to solving bufferbloat in the US, at least. I'm
just curious about the legal obstacles to bufferbloat
