Github user sesuncedu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-compress/pull/39
Replaced by PR https://github.com/apache/commons-compress/pull/43
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user sesuncedu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-compress/pull/39
Closing because there's a new PR without the coveralls bait.
Coveralls complains.
The mvnw is not essential yet, but it's good to have 3.5.0 in place.
---
If your
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-compress/pull/39
[](https://:/builds/12118668)
Coverage increased (+0.04%) to 84.766% when pulling
Github user bodewig commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-compress/pull/39
Thanks Simon.
TBH I'm not too sure why we've got Travis builds at all, probably so we can
run Coveralls. I'll leave this request open for those more interested in the
Travis CI
Github user sesuncedu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-compress/pull/39
Randomly adding coverage tests for coveralls
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-compress/pull/39
[](https://:/builds/12093740)
Coverage increased (+0.1%) to 84.828% when pulling
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-compress/pull/39
[](https://:/builds/12093695)
Coverage increased (+0.09%) to 84.815% when pulling
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-compress/pull/39
[](https://:/builds/12090926)
Coverage decreased (-0.008%) to 84.72% when pulling
Github user coveralls commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/commons-compress/pull/39
[](https://:/builds/12090041)
Coverage remained the same at 84.728% when pulling
