On Tue, Jan 23, 2024 at 12:04:23AM +0100, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> On 1/16/24 13:31, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 11:16:09AM +, Colin Ian King wrote:
> > > The variable ret is being assigned a value but it isn't being
> > > read afterwards. The assignment is redundant and
From: Dave Airlie
fences are signalled on nvidia hw using non-stall interrupts.
non-stall interrupts are not latched from my reading.
When nouveau emits a fence, it requests a NON_STALL signalling,
but it only calls the interface to allow the non-stall irq to happen
after it has already
In an effort to separate intentional arithmetic wrap-around from
unexpected wrap-around, we need to refactor places that depend on this
kind of math. One of the most common code patterns of this is:
VAR + value < VAR
Notably, this is considered "undefined behavior" for signed and pointer
In an effort to separate intentional arithmetic wrap-around from
unexpected wrap-around, we need to refactor places that depend on this
kind of math. One of the most common code patterns of this is:
VAR + value < VAR
Notably, this is considered "undefined behavior" for signed and pointer
On 1/16/24 13:31, Dan Carpenter wrote:
On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 11:16:09AM +, Colin Ian King wrote:
The variable ret is being assigned a value but it isn't being
read afterwards. The assignment is redundant and so ret can be
removed.
Cleans up clang scan build warning:
warning: Although the
Am 22.01.24 um 04:32 schrieb Xianrong Zhou:
The vmf_insert_pfn_prot could cause unnecessary double faults
on a device pfn. Because currently the vmf_insert_pfn_prot does
not make the pfn writable so the pte entry is normally read-only
or dirty catching.
What? How do you got to this conclusion?
