Hi,
Hello Sebastian,
I don't know much about Metafun yet, but shouldn't you use math-mode
for
\root and \frac?
oops, stupid typo. The code that didn't want to compile was
textext($\root a \of b$) and textext($\frac{a}{b}$), so I only
forgot the math signs when writing the email. Thanks
Hello Sebastian (sorry for sending twice; this time to the list),
\startuseMPgraphic{test}
draw textext($\frac{a}{b}$);
draw textext($\root a \of b$);
\stopuseMPgraphic
any reason you use textext here? Do you need changing labels? If not,
you should use
Hi,
any reason you use textext here? Do you need changing labels? If not,
you should use [...] draw btex $\frac{a}{b}$ etex; [...]
I thought textext was just a faster version of btex ... etex and
supposed that this would be the 'way to go', since it is a part of
MetaFun. But I checked out
Furthermore: in
\usemodule[nath]
\starttext
$ y = (1 + \frac{}{a}{b}) $
$ y = (1 + \frac{a}{b}) $
$ y = (1 + a\frac{b}{c}{d})$
$$ y = (1 + \frac{}{a}{b}) $$
$$ y = (1 + \frac{a}{b}) $$
$$ y = (1 + a\frac{b}{c}{d})$$
\stoptext
The displayed equation is correct, but the inline isn't
?
\usemodule[nath]
\starttext
$ y = (1 + \frac{}{a}{b}) $
$ y = (1 + \frac{a}{b}) $
\stoptext
What problem are you having? I tried this example and got the following
output (only typset nicely, of course):
y = (1 + (/a)b)
y = (1 + a/b)
Which appears to be the correct output. Are you
I'm taking a look at nath (via t-nath). Here's the very first thing I
tried:
In the following code, the first formula typesets as I want, and the
second doesn't. But the syntax in the second looks correct.
Bug or feature? or setup problem?
\usemodule[nath]
\starttext
$ y = (1 + \frac{}{a}{b
= (1 + \frac{}{a}{b}) $
$ y = (1 + \frac{a}{b}) $
\stoptext
Furthermore: I tried the LaTeX version of nath. It works as expected
(i.e. the second line produces a fraction)
So, ... it's looking like a bug in t-nath, I think.
-gary
___
ntg-context
On Mon, 16 Feb 2004, Gary Pajer wrote:
In the following code, the first formula typesets as I want, and the
second doesn't. But the syntax in the second looks correct.
Bug or feature? or setup problem?
\usemodule[nath]
\starttext
$ y = (1 + \frac{}{a}{b}) $
$ y = (1 + \frac{a}{b
\placeformula[form:a-prime]
\startformula
a^{'} = \frac{1,05 \times N_{s}}{q_{s}} = \frac{1,05
\times 0,246}{0,15} = 1,722 \approx \inframed{1,75 m}
\stopformula
%working
\placeformula[form:a-prime]
\startformula
\eqalignno{ %%or \leqalignno%%
a^{'} = \frac{1,05
Sunday, August 3, 2003 Emil Hedevang Lohse wrote:
EHL There seems to be a little bug; compare
EHL \[\frac A{1-\frac BC}\]
EHL with
EHL \[\frac A{(1-\frac BC)}\]
EHL In the latter the fraction in the denominator is placed so high that
EHL the B alsmost touches the fraction rule.
Thank
There seems to be a little bug; compare
\[\frac A{1-\frac BC}\]
with
\[\frac A{(1-\frac BC)}\]
In the latter the fraction in the denominator is placed so high that
the B alsmost touches the fraction rule.
--
Emil Hedevang Lohse http://home.imf.au.dk/emil/
Alle spørgsmål er lige
701 - 711 of 711 matches
Mail list logo