Re: [NTG-context] Another Metafun issue

2004-05-16 Thread Sebastian Sturm
Hi, Hello Sebastian, I don't know much about Metafun yet, but shouldn't you use math-mode for \root and \frac? oops, stupid typo. The code that didn't want to compile was textext($\root a \of b$) and textext($\frac{a}{b}$), so I only forgot the math signs when writing the email. Thanks

[NTG-context] Re: Another Metafun issue

2004-05-16 Thread Patrick Gundlach
Hello Sebastian (sorry for sending twice; this time to the list), \startuseMPgraphic{test} draw textext($\frac{a}{b}$); draw textext($\root a \of b$); \stopuseMPgraphic any reason you use textext here? Do you need changing labels? If not, you should use

Re: [NTG-context] Re: Another Metafun issue

2004-05-16 Thread Sebastian Sturm
Hi, any reason you use textext here? Do you need changing labels? If not, you should use [...] draw btex $\frac{a}{b}$ etex; [...] I thought textext was just a faster version of btex ... etex and supposed that this would be the 'way to go', since it is a part of MetaFun. But I checked out

Re: [NTG-context] t-nath difficulty

2004-02-19 Thread Gary Pajer
Furthermore: in \usemodule[nath] \starttext $ y = (1 + \frac{}{a}{b}) $ $ y = (1 + \frac{a}{b}) $ $ y = (1 + a\frac{b}{c}{d})$ $$ y = (1 + \frac{}{a}{b}) $$ $$ y = (1 + \frac{a}{b}) $$ $$ y = (1 + a\frac{b}{c}{d})$$ \stoptext The displayed equation is correct, but the inline isn't

Re: [NTG-context] t-nath difficulty

2004-02-17 Thread Gary Pajer
? \usemodule[nath] \starttext $ y = (1 + \frac{}{a}{b}) $ $ y = (1 + \frac{a}{b}) $ \stoptext What problem are you having? I tried this example and got the following output (only typset nicely, of course): y = (1 + (/a)b) y = (1 + a/b) Which appears to be the correct output. Are you

[NTG-context] t-nath difficulty

2004-02-16 Thread Gary Pajer
I'm taking a look at nath (via t-nath). Here's the very first thing I tried: In the following code, the first formula typesets as I want, and the second doesn't. But the syntax in the second looks correct. Bug or feature? or setup problem? \usemodule[nath] \starttext $ y = (1 + \frac{}{a}{b

Re: [NTG-context] t-nath difficulty

2004-02-16 Thread Gary Pajer
= (1 + \frac{}{a}{b}) $ $ y = (1 + \frac{a}{b}) $ \stoptext Furthermore: I tried the LaTeX version of nath. It works as expected (i.e. the second line produces a fraction) So, ... it's looking like a bug in t-nath, I think. -gary ___ ntg-context

Re: [NTG-context] t-nath difficulty

2004-02-16 Thread William D. Neumann
On Mon, 16 Feb 2004, Gary Pajer wrote: In the following code, the first formula typesets as I want, and the second doesn't. But the syntax in the second looks correct. Bug or feature? or setup problem? \usemodule[nath] \starttext $ y = (1 + \frac{}{a}{b}) $ $ y = (1 + \frac{a}{b

[NTG-context] diplayed centered equations

2004-02-03 Thread olivier Turlier
\placeformula[form:a-prime] \startformula a^{'} = \frac{1,05 \times N_{s}}{q_{s}} = \frac{1,05 \times 0,246}{0,15} = 1,722 \approx \inframed{1,75 m} \stopformula %working \placeformula[form:a-prime] \startformula \eqalignno{ %%or \leqalignno%% a^{'} = \frac{1,05

Re[2]: [NTG-context] Re: Math in context

2003-08-14 Thread Giuseppe Bilotta
Sunday, August 3, 2003 Emil Hedevang Lohse wrote: EHL There seems to be a little bug; compare EHL \[\frac A{1-\frac BC}\] EHL with EHL \[\frac A{(1-\frac BC)}\] EHL In the latter the fraction in the denominator is placed so high that EHL the B alsmost touches the fraction rule. Thank

Re: [NTG-context] Re: Math in context

2003-08-03 Thread Emil Hedevang Lohse
There seems to be a little bug; compare \[\frac A{1-\frac BC}\] with \[\frac A{(1-\frac BC)}\] In the latter the fraction in the denominator is placed so high that the B alsmost touches the fraction rule. -- Emil Hedevang Lohse http://home.imf.au.dk/emil/ Alle spørgsmål er lige

<    3   4   5   6   7   8