Re: [NTG-context] Re: minimal button width

2003-09-29 Thread Hans Hagen
At 13:09 28/09/2003 +0200, you wrote: Patrick Gundlach wrote: Hello Peter, with your code + \button[width=2.5mm, height=2.5mm]{Please, print me!}[test] \button[width=2.5mm, height=2.5mm]{Not this time!}[test] one value should be 25mm for a better example I get two empty square buttons which

Re[2]: [NTG-context] TeX capacity exceeded in MikTeX

2003-09-29 Thread Giuseppe Bilotta
Monday, September 29, 2003 ^Nitram^ wrote: Hi, ! TeX capacity exceeded, sorry [hash size=35000]. In MiKTeX the file is miktex.ini, not texmf.cnf; you should find a hash_size= entry there. There was no entry like this ;( But I created it (and also hash_size_def) in section MikTeX,

[NTG-context] Re: Do typescripts slow down ConTeXt?

2003-09-29 Thread Steffen Wolfrum
Hans Hagen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i admit that typescripts are not fast, but the advantages of the current method is that i can change them easily as well as use different criteria when loading them; i did some experiments with (memory hungry) preloading, but on my system it made no real

Re: [NTG-context] TeX capacity exceeded in MikTeX

2003-09-29 Thread Hans Hagen
At 11:00 29/09/2003 +0200, you wrote: Hi, ! TeX capacity exceeded, sorry [hash size=35000]. In MiKTeX the file is miktex.ini, not texmf.cnf; you should find a hash_size= entry there. There was no entry like this ;( But I created it (and also hash_size_def) in section MikTeX, pdfeTeX... I

Re: [NTG-context] Re: Do typescripts slow down ConTeXt?

2003-09-29 Thread Hans Hagen
At 12:39 29/09/2003 +0200, you wrote: Hans Hagen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i admit that typescripts are not fast, but the advantages of the current method is that i can change them easily as well as use different criteria when loading them; i did some experiments with (memory hungry)

[NTG-context] Re: Do typescripts slow down ConTeXt?

2003-09-29 Thread Steffen Wolfrum
Hans Hagen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At 12:39 29/09/2003 +0200, you wrote: Hans Hagen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i admit that typescripts are not fast, but the advantages of the current method is that i can change them easily as well as use different criteria when loading them; i did

Re: [NTG-context] scite

2003-09-29 Thread Willi Egger
Hi Hans, This is great. Ther must be said, that potential users must download also the MSCRV71.dll, which was at least not on my machine (Windows XP). it can be downloaded e.g. from http://cvs.osafoundation.org/index.cgi/osaf/chandler/Chandler/distrib/win/msvcr71.dll?sortby=log Further I am not

Re: [NTG-context] scite

2003-09-29 Thread Matthew Huggett
Further I am not sure how to get ConTeXt support in SciTE. I have opend the SciTEUser.properties file which resides in \Documents and Settings. There I added the files mentioned in the manual import cont-de-scite import cont-en-scite import cont-nl-scite import cont-xx-scite import metafun-scite

Re: [NTG-context] XML command synonyms

2003-09-29 Thread Simon Pepping
On Sat, Sep 27, 2003 at 12:18:21PM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote: At 07:41 27/09/2003 +0200, you wrote: From: Simon Pepping [EMAIL PROTECTED] P: How to define '' as a synonym of 'subsubsubsubsection' without wrtiting P: the same code twice? From DocbookInContext: %D A \type{\let}

Re: [NTG-context] TeX capacity exceeded in MikTeX

2003-09-29 Thread walter kehowski
The likely problem is an error on your part: a mismatched parenthesis or some other difficult to find mistake that occassionally doesn't warn you until you see a TeX capacity exceeded.. message. You might have to go through the usual process of starting with a piece of your document, compiling it.

[NTG-context] Re: TeX capacity exceeded in MikTeX

2003-09-29 Thread Patrick Gundlach
walter kehowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The likely problem is an error on your part: a mismatched parenthesis or some other difficult to find mistake that Hello Walter, a hash size of 35000 does not seem to be sufficient for ConTeXt. I doubt that that is really a mismatched paenthesis or

[NTG-context] Re: Again: How to make empty pages by default empty?

2003-09-29 Thread Patrick Gundlach
Steffen Wolfrum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: This \setupsectionblock[...part][page=no] is a good idea, but the pagebreak definition was wrong. See this: \definepagebreak [chapter] [yes,header,right] I can't see any difference here. Now it's fine. good to know. Patrick -- You