[...]
Should I write some documentation about TaBlE preambles and
commands (for the Wiki),
Giuseppe, please do so.
or would it be against some rule about its ($$$) documentation?
I doubt that there is any law that prohibits writing a documentation
from scratch.
Patrick
--
ConTeXt wiki
Dear list,
especially Hraban, who had asked for sth like this,
I had tried sending this yesterday, but with the pdf output included,
it was too big for the list.
In any case, please find enclosed a tentative lilypond inclusion file
and a sample
file. The whole thing basically works (though
Vit Zyka wrote:
It needs some new definitions to core-spa.tex (Hans ??):
\unexpanded\def\textormathglue#1#2#3{%
{\dimen0=#1\hspaceamount\empty{#3}%
\skip0=0pt plus.5\dimen0 minus.3\dimen0
\ifmmode\mskip#1#2%
\else\kern#1\hspaceamount\empty{#3}\hskip\skip0\fi\relax}%
}
Hi Hans,
I just installed the latest beta (14.09.2005) and realised, that
\limitatefirstline is still unchanged. Just read my last mail from the
12th for the details. Sorry for stealing your time.
So I have either to change the description on the wiki, or you have to
change the macro :)
This doesn't seem to be working here (using OS X + zsh); I always get
the old texexec.
Best
Thomas
On Sep 14, 2005, at 9:46 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
If you want to automatically run newtexexec instead of texexec, you
need to set the environment variable TEXMFSTART_MODE to 'experimental'
Christopher Creutzig wrote:
- I can't include blank lines in \startlilypond...\stoplilypond,
because in the buffer I will get a \par for that. There is
probably some easy way around this, but I haven't found the
idiom yet.
redefine par -)
- Currently, the whole generation only works
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
This doesn't seem to be working here (using OS X + zsh); I always get
the old texexec.
Best
Thomas
On Sep 14, 2005, at 9:46 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
If you want to automatically run newtexexec instead of texexec, you
need to set the environment variable
bin there, done that (with the file you posted yesterday:
#!/bin/sh
ruby /usr/local/teTeX/share/texmf.local/scripts/context/ruby/
texmfstart.rb texexec.pl $@
Is that the right method?
Thomas
On Sep 15, 2005, at 1:35 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
then you should replace your stub file
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
bin there, done that (with the file you posted yesterday:
#!/bin/sh
ruby /usr/local/teTeX/share/texmf.local/scripts/context/ruby/
texmfstart.rb texexec.pl $@
not texexex.pl but just texexec
-
Monday, September 12, 2005 Giuseppe Bilotta wrote:
No, table is actually all right. I seem to have met a bug,
though. The key c doesn't seem to work in a \ReFormat
\placetable[here][approx-1-0.11269]{Results for curve 1, radius 0.11269}
{\tfxx
\starttable[|l|l|r|ra.o0|l|ra.o0|l|ra.o0|l|]
OK, works like a charm!!
On Sep 15, 2005, at 2:38 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
bin there, done that (with the file you posted yesterday:
#!/bin/sh
ruby /usr/local/teTeX/share/texmf.local/scripts/context/ruby/
texmfstart.rb texexec.pl $@
not texexex.pl but just
Hans Hagen wrote:
Christopher Creutzig wrote:
- I can't include blank lines in \startlilypond...\stoplilypond,
because in the buffer I will get a \par for that. There is
probably some easy way around this, but I haven't found the
idiom yet.
redefine par -)
Won't help, since the
Christopher Creutzig wrote:
Won't help, since the \par in there is never evaluated. I need to stop
it being generated in the first place. I guess I probably should change
\catcode`\^^M and \catcode`\^^J before reading the contents.
\obeylines \let\obeyedlines\space
That would solve the
Am 2005-09-15 um 11:49 schrieb Christopher Creutzig:
especially Hraban, who had asked for sth like this,
Thank you for your work, I can't participate at the moment, am just
too busy.
Perhaps document what you did and what's missing at the wiki page:
http://wiki.contextgarden.net/LilyPond
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005, Hans Hagen wrote:
Anyhow, the new feature concerns
- graphic manipulations (downsampling and beyond)
Oh, I just wanted to submit a new module
(http://pmrb.free.fr/work/OS/ConTeXt/t-degrade.tex) for down-sampling to the
community, so this is no more necessary...
Cheers,
Peter Münster wrote:
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005, Hans Hagen wrote:
Anyhow, the new feature concerns
- graphic manipulations (downsampling and beyond)
Oh, I just wanted to submit a new module
(http://pmrb.free.fr/work/OS/ConTeXt/t-degrade.tex) for down-sampling to the
community, so this is
Hi,
I love both lilypond and context.
In my last project (thanks to which I substantially started using both
in a decent way) I included in metafun code 250 PDFs fragments made by
lily.
Perfect result.
So, I was asking myself: is lily direct inclusion in context so
relevant? Why?
Just for my
Giuseppe Bilotta wrote:
Any news on this? I really need it for my thesis ...
hm. I don't want to be responsible for you failing to deliver your
thesis in time ...
\def\!tfReFormat#1%
{\the \!taLeftGlue
\vbox{\forgetall\ialign{\span\the\!taDataColumnTemplate\cr#1\cr}}%
\the
Am 2005-09-15 um 23:00 schrieb andrea valle:
I love both lilypond and context.
In my last project (thanks to which I substantially started using
both in a decent way) I included in metafun code 250 PDFs fragments
made by lily.
Perfect result.
So, I was asking myself: is lily direct
19 matches
Mail list logo
