2007/7/10, Duncan Hothersall [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Duncan,
place the figure with the normal \placefigure command, process to whole
document, delete the unwanted figurelist entry in the tuo-file and
process
the document another time, you can add the --once option in the last run.
2007/7/10, Saji Njarackalazhikam Hameed [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Folks,
Is there a way to reset a \setupSomeThing[ ] directive?
Consider for instance a complex setup for TABLES. Imagine
I have used this setup for some parts of the document, but
later on I want to have a radically different
Hi Wolfgang,
Thanks very much for the detailed response. I have been organizing a
co-ordinated document development project (more in the next mail)
with my colleagues. We use a wiki to input contents, which I then
scrape with hapricot and filter into a context document. Having
a setup like what
On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, Norbert Zeh wrote:
E.g., in assignments I typeset, I often have either
\begin{question}
...
\end{question}
which simply produces
Question 1 ...
or
\begin{question}[20 marks]
...
\end{question}
which produces
Hello All,
I wanted to share my recent experience in co-ordinated document development.
In our office we have to make annual reports, each part of which is contributed
by a member. Previously everybody wrote 'Word' documents which was compiled
into a larger report.
Recently we had the idea to
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
2007/7/10, Aditya Mahajan [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Wolfgang,
Quoting Wolfgang Schuster [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Aditya,
the macro eats the endline char.
That would mean that tex will parse
=
\section why \unknown
test
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
@Hans: Is it possible to integrate a setups key into \bTABLE to write
something like \bTABLE[setups=table:noframe] to avoid the \start/\stop
and \setups{..} commands as I did in my example above.
I second this request. In fact, a setups (or
On 7/11/07, Saji Njarackalazhikam Hameed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello All,
I wanted to share my recent experience
Really interesting .
Please, put all these on
wiki.contextgarden.net
--
luigi
If your question is of interest
Ah, excellent. Also thanks to Wolfgang for his earlier comment. I
had looked at location=left before but was thrown off by the
excessive distance between the heading and the text...until I
discovered the meaning of width=fit. As you can see, I'm new to
context.
Has anybody looked into
Christopher Creutzig wrote:
\starttext
\startXML
aa::b/a
\stopXML
\stoptext
The problem is the \setpretty`\:=10 in \XMLsetspecials in
verb-xml.tex. This should only be done inside
Suggested patch (I hope it survives being sent by mail):
--- verb-xml.tex.orig 2007-07-11
Thanks, Luigi...i will do so. Would it be appropriate to put it under
the section General ConTeXt Documents? Let me know otherwise and
in that case let me know where would be a good place to add this
article.
saji
..
* luigi scarso [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2007-07-11 10:27:12 +0200]:
On 7/11/07,
Would it be appropriate to put it under
the section General ConTeXt Documents?
Yes
(You can always move/put under another category in a second moment ).
--
luigi
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an
I think this concept would help keep the styling (setups) away from
the structural markup (section, tables etc). This would be a much
desirable feature.
saji
On Jul 11, 2007, at 4:43 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
@Hans: Is it possible to
Hi,
I am slightly confused with the second part of the following example.
IMO only the 1st level should be packed, not the second.
Patrick
--
\starttext
\setupitemize[2][packed]
\startitemize [n]
\item eins
\item zwei
\startitemize
\item dies
Quoting Patrick Gundlach [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
I am slightly confused with the second part of the following example.
IMO only the 1st level should be packed, not the second.
Patrick
--
\starttext
\setupitemize[2][packed]
[...]
Hi Aditya,
\starttext
\setupitemize[2][packed]
[...]
\setupitemize[1][packed]
so in this example both are packed :)
Right after sending my mail I realized that this could be used against
me :)
Right now packedlistitem is for the entire itemgroup rather than for
each level. So, only
Hi Aditya,
Aditya Mahajan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 28 Jun 2007, Jesse Alama wrote:
I'm preparing a geometry course using ConTeXt and am impressed with the
system so far. One thing I need is to do is typeset various geometrical
symbols. It looks like ConTeXt already has the
Quoting Patrick Gundlach [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Right now packedlistitem is for the entire itemgroup rather than for
each level. So, only way around is to use an explicit unpacked
somewhere, e.g.,
\setupitemize[each][unpacked]
\setupitemize[1][packed]
OK, I see. Is this a feature or a (I
On Wed, 11 Jul 2007, Jesse Alama wrote:
Hi Aditya,
Aditya Mahajan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 28 Jun 2007, Jesse Alama wrote:
I'm preparing a geometry course using ConTeXt and am impressed with the
system so far. One thing I need is to do is typeset various geometrical
symbols.
I am experimenting with the various texexec command line options,
but it is a bit confusing.
I want to minimize the number of runs and suppress as much of the messages
as possible.
I tried (windows standalone context) :
1) texmfstart --pdf --runs=1 --silentmode texfile.tex
This still gave 3
2007/7/11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I am experimenting with the various texexec command line options,
but it is a bit confusing.
I want to minimize the number of runs and suppress as much of the messages
as possible.
I tried (windows standalone context) :
1) texmfstart --pdf
21 matches
Mail list logo
