Dear Wofgang,I made a sample text by inserting space to the text which you used when you test Korean before.I used un fonts which you can download from KTUG.After you compile it using LuaTeX, you can see some overfull lines which was mentioned by Dr. DoHyun Kim in the previous mail.Thank you for
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 11:34 AM, Mari Voipio wrote:
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
Caveat: This is advisable if you use Scite only with UTF-8 encoded files. If
you use SciTe for files with other encoding, it is not a good idea. Why, you
ask?
Because in the Encoding menu under File there's no way of
Mari
(...who's next job is to convert a pile of files into UTF-8...)
Maybe you can consider (under linux,I dont'know about windows)
recode
iconv
sometimes they are useful .
--
luigi
___
If your question is
Hi,
with the latest beta of this morning and the latest luatex, a call like
texexec --lua --env=mystyle myfile.xml
fails, the environment file is not read (there is no error about not
finding it in the log).
Thomas
luigi scarso wrote:
Maybe you can consider (under linux,I dont'know about windows)
recode
iconv
sometimes they are useful .
I have Cygwin installed to give me some command line tools and we
already figured out iconv is probably a useful tool. Recode, on the
other hand, doesn't seem to exist
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Mari Voipio mari.voi...@iki.fi wrote:
I have Cygwin installed to give me some command line tools and we already
figured out iconv is probably a useful tool. Recode, on the other hand,
doesn't seem to exist (man recode give 'No manual entry for recode' while
Mojca Miklavec wrote:
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 4:18 PM, Mari Voipio wrote:
Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
3. Select UTF-8 in menu File/Encoding
This solved problem number 1: how to do UTF in SciTe.
The problem is that you need to do that every time. There is some file
with user settings that you
I put a thinrule in a table as follows:
\starttext
\bTABLE
\bTR\bTD\thinrule\eTD\eTR
\eTABLE
\stoptext
It worked fine under MKII. However, when I switched to MKIV (both current and
beta) I got the following error message:
! Missing { inserted.
inserted text
{
to be read
On Fri, 24 Oct 2008, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
* Unlike when editing LaTeX files, it does not insert an \item when
doing C-c C-e itemize. I use itemizations a lot and this is a bit
annoying, especially that I got used to its behaior when doing LaTeX.
Also, having C-c C-j asking
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 4:06 PM, Peter Münster pmli...@free.fr wrote:
On Fri, 24 Oct 2008, Marcin Borkowski wrote:
* Unlike when editing LaTeX files, it does not insert an \item when
doing C-c C-e itemize. I use itemizations a lot and this is a bit
annoying, especially that I
Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
Hi,
with the latest beta of this morning and the latest luatex, a call like
texexec --lua --env=mystyle myfile.xml
fails, the environment file is not read (there is no error about not
finding it in the log).
ah .. in core-def.tex ...
\appendtoks
On Feb 5, 2009, at 4:25 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
ah .. in core-def.tex ...
\appendtoks \directsetup{*runtime:modules}\to \everyjob
's' missing in modules
OK, but now I get:
! LuaTeX error main ctx instance:1: attempt to index global
'ptbs' (a nil value)
stack traceback:
Am 05.02.2009 um 16:47 schrieb Thomas A. Schmitz:
On Feb 5, 2009, at 4:25 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
ah .. in core-def.tex ...
\appendtoks \directsetup{*runtime:modules}\to \everyjob
's' missing in modules
OK, but now I get:
[...]
l.330 \xmlprocess{main}{\inputfilename}{}
Do
On Feb 5, 2009, at 5:19 PM, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Do you use the last LuaTeX version?
I tried a example you send me and it works without problems.
This is LuaTeX, Version snapshot-0.33.1-2009020413, build unknown
Wolfgang
This is LuaTeX, Version snapshot-0.33.1-2009020508, build 1856
On Feb 5, 2009, at 5:36 PM, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
This is LuaTeX, Version snapshot-0.33.1-2009020508, build 1856
I'll try with an older version of luatex, maybe the trunk version
(which I compiled today) has a problem.
Thomas
Nope, I get exactly the same error with luatex 0.33.0; not
Am 05.02.2009 um 15:52 schrieb Bart C. Wise:
I put a thinrule in a table as follows:
\starttext
\bTABLE
\bTR\bTD\thinrule\eTD\eTR
\eTABLE
\stoptext
It worked fine under MKII. However, when I switched to MKIV (both
current and beta) I got the following error message:
[...]
Is this a
I, apparently, do not understand the syntax and/or uses of /def. I am
trying to make section heads appear in all caps and underlined. I
originally tried to just use \setuphead, but found that I using the
textcommand option I could only either capitalize or underline and
not both. I then figured
Am 05.02.2009 um 18:37 schrieb Michael Bynum:
I, apparently, do not understand the syntax and/or uses of /def. I am
trying to make section heads appear in all caps and underlined. I
originally tried to just use \setuphead, but found that I using the
textcommand option I could only either
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009, Michael Bynum wrote:
I, apparently, do not understand the syntax and/or uses of /def. I am
trying to make section heads appear in all caps and underlined. I
originally tried to just use \setuphead, but found that I using the
textcommand option I could only either
Ah, I think I see. So \define[1]\mysectionhead{\bfa
\WORD{\underbar{#1}}} would also be valid. Is \define a context
equivalent to the \def command for tex? I couldn't find much
documentation on it.
Mike
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 12:55 PM, Wolfgang Schuster
schuster.wolfg...@googlemail.com
Yes, I think I may have an older version of context here at work. I
was able to use the deeptextcommand at home, but here at work it
wasn't working. It doesn't seem to be recognized. Was it a later
implementation perhaps that an older version wouldn't have?
Mike
On Thu, Feb 5, 2009 at 12:59
Hello,
\completelistof... does not work with MKIV
(ConTeXt 2009.01.18 and LuaTeX snapshot-0.31.3-2008123108):
\definesynonyms[Acro][acronymes]
\Acro{HTML}{HyperText Markup Language}
\Acro{PDF}{Portable Document Format}
\starttext
\HTML\ and \PDF
\completelistofacronymes
\stoptext
Cheers, Peter
On Feb 5, 2009, at 5:59 PM, Thomas A. Schmitz wrote:
Nope, I get exactly the same error with luatex 0.33.0; not with all
of my xml files, however. I'll have to see if I can isolate the
error. Thanks for your reply, Wolfgang.
Best
Thomas
OK, one problem is math support. Here's a minimal
Hello,
\FlushStep eats all kind of breakable spaces ( , \ and \space):
\usemodule[pre-stepwise]
\setupinteraction[state=start]
\starttext
\StartSteps
bla \FlushStep bla\FlushStep
\StopSteps
\page
\StartSteps
bla\ \FlushStep\ bla\FlushStep
\StopSteps
\page
\StartSteps
bla\space\FlushStep\space
Am 05.02.2009 um 19:45 schrieb Michael Bynum:
Ah, I think I see. So \define[1]\mysectionhead{\bfa
\WORD{\underbar{#1}}} would also be valid. Is \define a context
equivalent to the \def command for tex? I couldn't find much
documentation on it.
\define is ConTeXt's equivalent to \newcommand
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009, luigi scarso wrote:
Here some code that you can attach to your .emacs file (just a copy from
auctex with minor modifications):
Peter, can you put it into wiki ?
Of course, just as everybody else can do it ;)
But this is only a quick workaround. It would be nicer, if a
Hello Hans,
\mkdoifelsebuffer is a nice command. Is it wanted, that there is no
\doifelsebuffer or did you just forget it?
Cheers, Peter
--
Contact information: http://pmrb.free.fr/contact/
___
If your question is
Am 05.02.2009 um 20:03 schrieb Peter Münster:
Hello,
\FlushStep eats all kind of breakable spaces ( , \ and \space):
\usemodule[pre-stepwise]
\setupinteraction[state=start]
Here is a ConTeXt version of LaTeX's \...@addto@macro macro.
\long\def\addmacro#1\to#2% better name needed
When a function is called, I would like to remove any leading space. Then the
function can control the spacing. If I don't remove spaces, it then makes a
difference whether or not I have a space before the function is called.
I would like the output of the following two lines to be equal:
Am 05.02.2009 um 21:26 schrieb Bart C. Wise:
When a function is called, I would like to remove any leading space.
Then the function can control the spacing. If I don't remove spaces,
it then makes a difference whether or not I have a space before the
function is called.
Is there a way
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Here is a ConTeXt version of LaTeX's \...@addto@macro macro.
\long\def\addmacro#1\to#2% better name needed
{\begingroup
\scratchtoks\expandafter{#2#1}%
\xdef#2{\the\scratchtoks}%
\endgroup}
\addmacro\relax\to\FlushStep
This seems
On Thursday 05 February 2009 01:36:16 pm Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 05.02.2009 um 21:26 schrieb Bart C. Wise:
When a function is called, I would like to remove any leading space.
Then the function can control the spacing. If I don't remove spaces,
it then makes a difference whether or not
Am 05.02.2009 um 21:49 schrieb Peter Münster:
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Here is a ConTeXt version of LaTeX's \...@addto@macro macro.
\long\def\addmacro#1\to#2% better name needed
{\begingroup
\scratchtoks\expandafter{#2#1}%
\xdef#2{\the\scratchtoks}%
\endgroup}
Am 05.02.2009 um 21:55 schrieb Peter Münster:
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
A faster version of your macro is:
\def\MyFunction
{\dosingleempty\doMyFunction}
\def\doMyFunction[#1]%
{\removeunwantedspaces\executeifdefined{myfunction:#1}
{\getvalue{myfunction:default}}}
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
A faster version of your macro is:
\def\MyFunction
{\dosingleempty\doMyFunction}
\def\doMyFunction[#1]%
{\removeunwantedspaces\executeifdefined{myfunction:#1}{\getvalue{myfunction:default}}}
\setvalue{myfunction:1}{\medspace dog }
Am 05.02.2009 um 22:08 schrieb Wolfgang Schuster:
Am 05.02.2009 um 21:55 schrieb Peter Münster:
A faster version of your macro is:
\def\MyFunction
{\dosingleempty\doMyFunction}
\def\doMyFunction[#1]%
{\removeunwantedspaces\executeifdefined{myfunction:#1}
{\getvalue{myfunction:default}}}
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Like this for example:
\def\FlushStep{\iftrialtypesetting\else\StopStep\NextStep\StartStep\fi\relax}
1. Only Hans can do this.
2. This is also what happens with my macro.
3. I think it's better to use my macro than to use manual patched
Peter Münster wrote:
Hello,
\completelistof... does not work with MKIV
(ConTeXt 2009.01.18 and LuaTeX snapshot-0.31.3-2008123108):
\definesynonyms[Acro][acronymes]
\Acro{HTML}{HyperText Markup Language}
\Acro{PDF}{Portable Document Format}
\starttext
\HTML\ and \PDF
\completelistofacronymes
38 matches
Mail list logo
