Am 25.03.2012 um 04:41 schrieb S Barmeier:
On 03/23/2012 03:11 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 22-3-2012 15:09, S Barmeier wrote:
I have leaved through the ConTeXt and MetaFun manuals on the search for
examples of graphics resembling the attached file which I created in
TikZ.
I was wanting to
Hello all,
can somehow insert the chapter (section, subsection, ...) number as a
prefix of itemize list?
Thanx Jaroslav
Example show exactly what I mean:
\section{First section}
\startitemize
\item aaa
\item bbb
\item ccc
\stopitemize
\section{Second section}
\startitemize
\item ddd
Am 25.03.2012 um 10:36 schrieb Jaroslav Hajtmar:
Hello all,
can somehow insert the chapter (section, subsection, ...) number as a prefix
of itemize list?
Thanx Jaroslav
Example show exactly what I mean:
\section{First section}
\startitemize
\item aaa
\item bbb
\item ccc
Thanx Wolfgang.
How easy!
Can I also put subsection (subsubsection) number to the prefix too? It
is possible eventually set the depth level?
For example: \setupitemize[each][n,broad][prefix=yes, depthlevel=3]
Thanx
Jaroslav Hajtmar
Example shows how occurence of the subsections reflects
Am 25.03.2012 um 11:36 schrieb Jaroslav Hajtmar:
Thanx Wolfgang.
How easy!
Can I also put subsection (subsubsection) number to the prefix too? It is
possible eventually set the depth level?
For example: \setupitemize[each][n,broad][prefix=yes, depthlevel=3]
You can change the section
Excellent. If works now fine!
Thanx very much Wolfgang..
Jaroslav
Dne 25.3.2012 12:02, Wolfgang Schuster napsal(a):
Am 25.03.2012 um 11:36 schrieb Jaroslav Hajtmar:
Thanx Wolfgang.
How easy!
Can I also put subsection (subsubsection) number to the prefix too? It is
possible eventually
Wolfgang,
Thank you for that info. That is unfortunate. Is there any way I can achieve
what I need? That is
1. Foo
+ Some bullet item 1,
+ Some bullet item 2,
+ Some bullet item 3.
2. Baz
Thank you.
Malte.
On 25/03/2012, at 3:54, ntg-context-requ...@ntg.nl wrote:
ConTeXt uses
Hi,
is there a reason why hyphenation of compound Lwk-Maut does not work in
following example?
\showframe
\mainlanguage[de]
\setbreakpoints[compound]
\setnumber[footnote][114]
\starttext
test
{\startfootnote[ftn115]
siehe Schlussbericht der zuständigen Bund-Länder-Arbeitsgruppe
You can use \startitemize[1] directly. (You can put it in a macro, so if you
ever want to change the style of bullets, you just have to adjust the macro.)
\startnlist
\item Foo
\startitemize[1]
\item Some bullet item 1,
\item Some bullet item 2.
\stopitemize
\item Baz
\startnlist % start
Hello Wolfgang.
Once again I return to this topic. I send an example thatbehaves strangely.
It's a bad set of values, or error ConTeXt?
Thanx Jaroslav
\starttext
\setupitemize[each][width=3em,prefix=yes,prefixset=all]
\section{Section}
\subsection{Subsection}
\startitemize[n]
\item A
\item
On 24-3-2012 21:23, Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Sat, Mar 03, 2012 at 12:09:11AM +0100, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 29-2-2012 14:57, Khaled Hosny wrote:
Hi all,
Was exploring font goodies and color schemes and so far works great,
very nice feature, thanks Hans.
Now I've to small questions/feature
On 25-3-2012 13:34, Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
\showframe
\mainlanguage[de]
\setbreakpoints[compound]
\setnumber[footnote][114]
\starttext
test
{\startfootnote[ftn115]
siehe Schlussbericht der zuständigen Bund-Länder-Arbeitsgruppe
„Verkehrsverlagerungen info Lkw-Maut“, BT-Dr16/298
On 24/03/12 11:39, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 24.03.2012 um 09:54 schrieb Pablo Rodríguez:
[...]
Pages previous to chapters with no text should also lack header and
footer, but in the example above this doesn't work when text divisions
(such as front matter, body matter, appendices and back
Using beta from yesterday, I have discovered that
\setupnotation[number=no] works fine for footnotes, but it doesn't work
for linenotes.
The sample that shows the issue is the following:
\setupnotation[footnote][location=columns,number=no]
\definelinenote[dict]
\setupnotation[dict][number=no]
Am 25.03.2012 um 16:05 schrieb Jaroslav Hajtmar:
Hello Wolfgang.
Once again I return to this topic. I send an example thatbehaves strangely.
It's a bad set of values, or error ConTeXt?
The output is correct because the prefix is only added in front of the normal
number.
I guess you want in
Am 25.03.2012 um 17:05 schrieb Hans Hagen:
On 25-3-2012 13:34, Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
\showframe
\mainlanguage[de]
\setbreakpoints[compound]
\setnumber[footnote][114]
\starttext
test
{\startfootnote[ftn115]
siehe Schlussbericht der zuständigen Bund-Länder-Arbeitsgruppe
16 matches
Mail list logo
