Am 22.06.2012 20:07, schrieb Manfred Lotz:
Siddhanta from Mihail Bayaryn which IIRC is a successor of his Chandas
font is a very nice one;
http://svayambhava.blogspot.de/p/siddhanta-devanagariunicode-open-type.html
Thank you all for the links.
Greetings, Martin
Hi all,
I need a (pre-linebreak) callback to behave the same way with the
Context and Plain formats. *The sequence that nodes are traversed
in is very important.* Afaict the callback will have to be
registered as a “processors”/“before” nodes task. However, the
behavior is not identical:
1. If
Can someone explain why the element-of is not printed when directly put into
the source, but only if introduced through TeX-math? The input file is in UTF-8
and in the texteditor the character does appear. Example:
\setuppapersize[A6][A6]
\starttext
\start
\setupbodyfont[lucidaot]
Requested
Am 25.06.2012 um 16:03 schrieb Meer, H. van der:
Can someone explain why the element-of is not printed when directly put
into the source, but only if introduced through TeX-math? The input file is
in UTF-8 and in the texteditor the character does appear. Example:
The symbol does not appear
On 25-6-2012 15:39, Philipp Gesang wrote:
- Which node task gets me a behavior similar to the raw
pre_linebreak_filter?[*]
depends on what plain does ... anyway, 'before' is pretty raw i guess
- Does the difference wrt node subtype matter assuming I only
(a) copy glyph nodes
From the MathML prime I tried this example from page 74:
math xmlns=http://www.w3c.org/mathml; version=2.0
semantics
apply eq/
ci e /ci
apply times/
ci m /ci
···date: 2012-06-25, Monday···from: Hans Hagen···
On 25-6-2012 15:39, Philipp Gesang wrote:
- Does the difference wrt node subtype matter assuming I only
(a) copy glyph nodes and (b) manipulate their .char field?
not that much, it's just a state signal for font processing
Good to
On 25 jun. 2012, at 16:21, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 25.06.2012 um 16:03 schrieb Meer, H. van der:
Can someone explain why the element-of is not printed when directly put
into the source, but only if introduced through TeX-math? The input file is
in UTF-8 and in the texteditor the
Hello ConTeXist.
During the discussion in CSTeX maillist fell a question about
possibility typing of Indian texts with use ConTeXt. (using of Indian
OpenType fonts), which is not yet in LuaTEX.
Is somewhere any information available on this issue?
I rate myself with no experience of exotic
Hey list,
I'm using ConTeXt 2012.06.25 and I noticed a broken compilation of my
book:
! Undefined control sequence.
argument \@@efinteraction
\doifnot #1#2-\edef \m_syst_string_one {#1
}\edef \m_syst_string_two
{#2}\if...
Am 26.06.2012 um 01:59 schrieb Kip Warner:
Hey list,
I'm using ConTeXt 2012.06.25 and I noticed a broken compilation of my
book:
grph-epd.mkiv (untested):
\startsetups system:graphics:epdf
%\ctxlua{figures.mergegoodies(\@@efinteraction)}%
On Tue, 2012-06-26 at 05:27 +0200, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
grph-epd.mkiv (untested):
\startsetups system:graphics:epdf
%\ctxlua{figures.mergegoodies(\@@efinteraction)}%
\ctxlua{figures.mergegoodies(\externalfiguresparameter\c!interaction)}%
\reference[\figurereference]{}% todo:
12 matches
Mail list logo