On 2013–04–03 Hans Hagen wrote:
On 4/3/2013 12:46 PM, Marco Patzer wrote:
Hi,
the latest beta throws:
mtx-context | redirect texlua - luajittex: luajittex --luaonly
/tmp/luajitbug/newbeta/tex/texmf-linux-64/bin/mtxrun --script context
--jit t
On 4/4/2013 9:21 AM, Marco Patzer wrote:
On 2013–04–03 Hans Hagen wrote:
On 4/3/2013 12:46 PM, Marco Patzer wrote:
Hi,
the latest beta throws:
mtx-context | redirect texlua - luajittex: luajittex --luaonly
/tmp/luajitbug/newbeta/tex/texmf-linux-64/bin/mtxrun --script context --jit t
On 2013–04–04 Hans Hagen wrote:
Indeed, LuajitTeX works, but you broke MkII. The format generation
already fails:
…
(/tmp/mkiitest/tex/texmf/metapost/base/string.mp
(/tmp/mkiitest/tex/texmf-context/metapost/context/base/mp-func.mpii) ) )
(end occurred when else on line 5 was
On 2013–04–04 Marco Patzer wrote:
On 2013–04–04 Hans Hagen wrote:
Indeed, LuajitTeX works, but you broke MkII. The format generation
already fails:
…
(/tmp/mkiitest/tex/texmf/metapost/base/string.mp
(/tmp/mkiitest/tex/texmf-context/metapost/context/base/mp-func.mpii) ) )
Hi all,
since I got the same issue reported in that unanswered question
http://www.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2011/064172.html, before
switch from the 0.70 version installed by default in Ubuntu to another
one, is the \setupparagraphnumbering command supposed to work well
now?
My best regards
Hi Diego!
···date: 2013-04-04, Thursday···from: Diego Depaoli···
Hi all,
since I got the same issue reported in that unanswered question
http://www.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2011/064172.html, before
switch from the 0.70 version installed by default in Ubuntu to another
one, is the
Am 04.04.2013 um 13:48 schrieb Diego Depaoli trebes...@gmail.com:
Hi all,
since I got the same issue reported in that unanswered question
http://www.ntg.nl/pipermail/ntg-context/2011/064172.html, before
switch from the 0.70 version installed by default in Ubuntu to another
one, is the
Hi all,
I have a document, wherein reside chapters and sections. I have an enumeration
defined which is used in the sections. What I would like to achieve is, to
reset the numbering at the beginning of each section.
How is this done?
Kind regards
Willi
On Thu, 4 Apr 2013 06:36:55 +0200
Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com wrote:
Am 03.04.2013 um 21:28 schrieb john Culleton j...@wexfordpress.com:
Working with TOC layout and the new manual. The default layout
leaves a blank line between section entries. I want to reduce
This might not be the best way to do it, but when I need it, I use
\resetnumber[problem]
for my
\startproblem
\stopproblem
enumeration.
Matthias
On Apr 4, 2013, at 4:01 PM, Willi Egger cont...@boede.nl wrote:
Hi all,
I have a document, wherein reside chapters and sections. I have an
On 4/4/2013 10:45 PM, Matthias Weber wrote:
This might not be the best way to do it, but when I need it, I use
\resetnumber[problem]
for my
\startproblem
\stopproblem
enumeration.
\defineenumeration[test]
\setupenumeration[test][way=bysection]
\starttext
\startsection[title=one]
On 4/4/2013 10:45 PM, Matthias Weber wrote:
This might not be the best way to do it, but when I need it, I use
\resetnumber[problem]
for my
\startproblem
\stopproblem
enumeration.
\defineenumeration[test]
\setupenumeration[test][way=bysection]
\starttext
\startsection[title=one]
On Thu, 4 Apr 2013, Willi Egger wrote:
Hi all,
I have a document, wherein reside chapters and sections. I have an
enumeration defined which is used in the sections. What I would like to
achieve is, to reset the numbering at the beginning of each section. How
is this done?
On Thu, 4 Apr 2013, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 4/4/2013 10:45 PM, Matthias Weber wrote:
This might not be the best way to do it, but when I need it, I use
\resetnumber[problem]
for my
\startproblem
\stopproblem
enumeration.
\defineenumeration[test]
\setupenumeration[test][way=bysection]
I
Hi context list,
I noticed that the ∓ sign is a little higher than the ± sign, so that
the + signs are at the same height. But this looks strange and should be
changed.
$ context --version
mtx-context | ConTeXt Process Management 0.60
mtx-context | current version: 2013.03.24 15:11
On Thu, 4 Apr 2013, Xenia wrote:
Hi context list,
I noticed that the ∓ sign is a little higher than the ± sign, so that
the + signs are at the same height. But this looks strange and should be
changed.
Indeed. These look very odd. I tested this with cambria and the outcome is
similar, so
On 4/4/2013 11:18 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Thu, 4 Apr 2013, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 4/4/2013 10:45 PM, Matthias Weber wrote:
This might not be the best way to do it, but when I need it, I use
\resetnumber[problem]
for my
\startproblem
\stopproblem
enumeration.
\defineenumeration[test]
On 4/4/2013 11:44 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Thu, 4 Apr 2013, Xenia wrote:
Hi context list,
I noticed that the ∓ sign is a little higher than the ± sign, so that
the + signs are at the same height. But this looks strange and should be
changed.
Indeed. These look very odd. I tested this
On Fri, 5 Apr 2013, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 4/4/2013 11:44 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Thu, 4 Apr 2013, Xenia wrote:
Hi context list,
I noticed that the ∓ sign is a little higher than the ± sign, so that
the + signs are at the same height. But this looks strange and should be
changed.
On 3/28/2013 6:00 PM, Tobias Columbus wrote:
Hi all,
While playing with \startmathcases, I discovered some strange (maybe
wanted?) behaviour of \startmathcases and
\stopmathcases:
- The interline spacing in mathcases is different depending on whether
the mathcases are used in a mathalignment
On 4/5/2013 12:13 AM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Fri, 5 Apr 2013, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 4/4/2013 11:44 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Thu, 4 Apr 2013, Xenia wrote:
Hi context list,
I noticed that the ∓ sign is a little higher than the ± sign, so that
the + signs are at the same height. But this
On Fri, Apr 05, 2013 at 12:55:40AM +0200, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 4/5/2013 12:13 AM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Fri, 5 Apr 2013, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 4/4/2013 11:44 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
On Thu, 4 Apr 2013, Xenia wrote:
Hi context list,
I noticed that the ∓ sign is a little higher than
22 matches
Mail list logo
