Re: [NTG-context] Parameter first of \setupindenting works?

2014-12-02 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 02.12.2014 um 08:33 schrieb 19cat d...@nou.cat: I have another question, using this \setupheads solution. When I use \title and \subject the result of first and next options of \setupindenting are omitted. While in \chapter and \sections with \setupheads[indentnext={yes,first}]

Re: [NTG-context] Parameter first of \setupindenting works?

2014-12-02 Thread 19cat
Well, I understood that: - indent first paragraph after heads is configured with indentnext of \setuphead . - first/next option of \setupindenting refers only first paragraf of document before heads. That is correct? 19cat El 02/12/2014, a les 9:49 a.m., Wolfgang Schuster

Re: [NTG-context] Parameter first of \setupindenting works?

2014-12-02 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Tue, 2 Dec 2014, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Am 02.12.2014 um 08:33 schrieb 19cat d...@nou.cat: I have another question, using this \setupheads solution. When I use \title and \subject the result of first and next options of \setupindenting are omitted. While in \chapter and \sections

[NTG-context] Primes again in math

2014-12-02 Thread Mikael P. Sundqvist
Hi! A possible bug in latest standalone: \starttext $u''(t)$ \stoptext yields u'(t) (one prime!). Is there a quick fix? I have a lot of '' in my file, so it would be nice not to have to change all of them... Result is attached. /Mikael open source 1 1

Re: [NTG-context] Primes again in math

2014-12-02 Thread Herbert Voss
Mikael P. Sundqvist schrieb: A possible bug in latest standalone: \starttext $u''(t)$ \stoptext yields u'(t) (one prime!). Is there a quick fix? I have a lot of '' in my file, so it would be nice not to have to change all of them... use $u{''}(t)$ Herbert

Re: [NTG-context] Primes again in math

2014-12-02 Thread Mikael P. Sundqvist
On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Herbert Voss herbert.v...@fu-berlin.de wrote: use $u{''}(t)$ Herbert Thanks, that works! Before adapting this in all places I'd like to know if this is the way it should be done from now on? If not, I'd like to know the suggested way. So I don't have to change

Re: [NTG-context] Primes again in math

2014-12-02 Thread Herbert Voss
Am 02.12.2014 um 18:57 schrieb Mikael P. Sundqvist: On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Herbert Voss herbert.v...@fu-berlin.de wrote: use $u{''}(t)$ Thanks, that works! Before adapting this in all places I'd like to know if this is the way it should be done from now on? If not, I'd like to

Re: [NTG-context] Primes again in math

2014-12-02 Thread Hans Hagen
On 12/2/2014 6:57 PM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote: On Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Herbert Voss herbert.v...@fu-berlin.de wrote: use $u{''}(t)$ Herbert Thanks, that works! Before adapting this in all places I'd like to know if this is the way it should be done from now on? If not, I'd like to

[NTG-context] useattachment

2014-12-02 Thread Andrea Valle
Dear list, In the previous version of a programming manual I wrote I used this definition: \define[1]\Ex{\externalfigure[code/#1] \useattachment[ex][code/#1.scd] \attachment[ex] } In this way I could have \Ex{sintesi/sineArray} where sintesi/sineArray.scd is the path of code example and

[NTG-context] useattachment

2014-12-02 Thread Andrea Valle
(Sorry if have already posted this, can’t find it in the archives, so maybe it didn’t go thru) On 01 Dec 2014, at 21:49, Andrea Valle va...@unito.it wrote: Dear list, In the previous version of a programming manual I wrote I used this definition: \define[1]\Ex{\externalfigure[code/#1]