On 7/12/2015 7:02 PM, Rik Kabel wrote:
The following code fails; however, it succeeds without newotf, and it
succeeds with newotf if the defined font feature (*hebrew) is removed
from the \definefont command. The characters that demonstrate the
problem are HEBREW LETTER LAMED combined with
On 7/11/2015 5:56 PM, Procházka Lukáš Ing. - Pontex s. r. o. wrote:
Hello,
I'm getting the following error:
mtx-context | run 1: luatex
--fmt=c:/Ctx-Beta/tex/texmf-cache/luatex-cache/context/5fe67e0bfe781ce0dde...
iv --c:kindofrun=1 --c:maxnofruns=9 --c:nonstopmode
On 7/11/2015 4:30 PM, Paul Mazaitis wrote:
Hans or Taco (or anyone?): are there plans to update mtxrun to generate
the current complete interface when using this script?
I don't know ... just explain what to do ...
-
It seems to be related to the latest beta recoding.
Probably, as your code below compiles without any problem in the
pre-most-recent-beta distribution.
Alan
On Sat, 11 Jul 2015 22:42:26 +0200
Lukáš Procházka l...@pontex.cz wrote:
when trying to compile the latest Alan's proposals with the
On 07/12/2015 04:12 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
[...]
maybe some file is not loaded ... i uploaded a variant that might work
better
Many thanks for the new beta.
I’m afraid that this sample doesn’t work with latest beta either:
\usemodule[newotf]
\definefontfeature[noliga][liga=no]
On 07/12/2015 11:33 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 7/12/2015 6:55 AM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
[...]
May the different behaviour caused by the fact that you use
LuaTeX-0.80.1 (as displayed in
http://www.pragma-ade.com/general/qrcs/setup-en.pdf) and we have
LuaTeX-0.80?
i can't imagine .. can you
On 7/12/2015 12:22 AM, Lukáš Procházka wrote:
Hello,
\pushbackground seems to be broken in the last beta - this doesn't
compile (but it did till now):
works ok here ... also, that code hasn't changed
-
On 7/12/2015 6:55 AM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
On 07/11/2015 11:55 PM, Rik Kabel wrote:
On 2015-07-11 17:30, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 7/11/2015 5:09 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
Hans,
[...]
I discovered that em- and en-dashes aren’t enabled by default.
Is this intended?
works ok here
Hmmm. Fails
On 7/12/2015 12:49 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
On 07/12/2015 11:33 AM, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 7/12/2015 6:55 AM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
[...]
May the different behaviour caused by the fact that you use
LuaTeX-0.80.1 (as displayed in
http://www.pragma-ade.com/general/qrcs/setup-en.pdf) and we have
On 7/12/2015 5:27 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
On 07/12/2015 05:17 PM, Otared Kavian wrote:
Hi Pablo,
On my installation everything seems to work fine: Context
version 2015.07.12 15:40
Hi Otared,
many thanks for your reply.
Which is your OS and architecture?
you use m-newotf from the
The following code fails; however, it succeeds without newotf, and it
succeeds with newotf if the defined font feature (*hebrew) is removed
from the \definefont command. The characters that demonstrate the
problem are HEBREW LETTER LAMED combined with HEBREW POINT HOLAM,
followed by HEBREW
Am 12.07.2015 um 16:38 schrieb Pablo Rodriguez oi...@gmx.es:
On 07/12/2015 04:12 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
[...]
maybe some file is not loaded ... i uploaded a variant that might work
better
Many thanks for the new beta.
I’m afraid that this sample doesn’t work with latest beta either:
On 2015-07-12 10:38, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
On 07/12/2015 04:12 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
[...]
maybe some file is not loaded ... i uploaded a variant that might work
better
Many thanks for the new beta.
I’m afraid that this sample doesn’t work with latest beta either:
\usemodule[newotf]
On 7/12/2015 6:42 PM, Rik Kabel wrote:
On 2015-07-12 10:38, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
On 07/12/2015 04:12 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
[...]
maybe some file is not loaded ... i uploaded a variant that might work
better
Many thanks for the new beta.
I’m afraid that this sample doesn’t work with latest
Hi Pablo,On my installation everything seems to work fine: Context version2015.07.12 15:40
Please see the attached file.Best regards: OK
newotf-ligatures.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document
On 12 Jul 2015, at 11:38, Pablo Rodriguez oi...@gmx.es wrote:On 07/12/2015
On 07/12/2015 05:04 PM, Axel Kielhorn wrote:
Am 12.07.2015 um 16:38 schrieb Pablo Rodriguez:
[...]
To the list members: could you test the sample above and tell em- and
en-dashes work and if no-liga disables ligatures? Adding architecture
may help.
I’m using
current version: 2015.07.12
On 07/12/2015 05:57 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 7/12/2015 5:27 PM, Pablo Rodriguez wrote:
[...]
Hi Otared,
many thanks for your reply.
Which is your OS and architecture?
you use m-newotf from the distribution?
I use the one installed after updating the beta.
I have just checked it and it
On 07/12/2015 05:17 PM, Otared Kavian wrote:
Hi Pablo,
On my installation everything seems to work fine: Context
version 2015.07.12 15:40
Hi Otared,
many thanks for your reply.
Which is your OS and architecture?
Many thanks again,
Pablo
--
http://www.ousia.tk
18 matches
Mail list logo
