Re: [NTG-context] italian index: "I" and "J" under "I", "U" and "V" under "V"

2017-06-26 Thread Hans Åberg
> On 26 Jun 2017, at 15:34, Hans Hagen wrote: > > On 6/26/2017 2:48 PM, MF wrote: >> >> there's a bug in the way ConTeXt groups the items of a register when >> "indicator=yes" and mainlanguage is "it": >> - items starting with the J letter are grouped under the I letter >> -

Re: [NTG-context] italian index: "I" and "J" under "I", "U" and "V" under "V"

2017-06-26 Thread mf
> in sort-lan.lua you can fix the table: > > definitions["it"] = { >  entries = { > > (not sure which italian is responsible for it) > > Hans > > Thank you, Hans. Looking at the code, there's a revealing comment before the definitions for the Latin language:  -- Treating the

Re: [NTG-context] Fw: thanks for your support

2017-06-26 Thread martin.kolarik
Hello friend, I wanted to thank you for your support and share with you some interesting information, you may find it here http://bit.do/dxm9S All best, martin.kolarik From: ntg-context [mailto:ntg-context@ntg.nl] Sent: Monday, June 26, 2017 9:53 AM To: martin.kola...@email.cz Subject:

Re: [NTG-context] italian index: "I" and "J" under "I", "U" and "V" under "V"

2017-06-26 Thread Hans Hagen
On 6/26/2017 2:48 PM, MF wrote: Hello list, there's a bug in the way ConTeXt groups the items of a register when "indicator=yes" and mainlanguage is "it": - items starting with the J letter are grouped under the I letter - items starting with the V letter are grouped under the U letter This is

[NTG-context] italian index: "I" and "J" under "I", "U" and "V" under "V"

2017-06-26 Thread MF
Hello list, there's a bug in the way ConTeXt groups the items of a register when "indicator=yes" and mainlanguage is "it": - items starting with the J letter are grouped under the I letter - items starting with the V letter are grouped under the U letter This is not what one would expect from an

Re: [NTG-context] Adjusting column width dynamically to get rid of orphans and widows

2017-06-26 Thread Thomas Widmann
On 25 June 2017 at 12:16, Hans Hagen wrote: > On 6/24/2017 4:48 PM, Thomas Widmann wrote: >> >> Lots of published dictionaries are full of orphans and widows because >> they're so hard to avoid without a lot of manual intervention, which >> is why I'm keen to explore any novel ways