Re: [NTG-context] is it useful to use the option "--fonts=all" when running first-setup-sh?

2019-06-25 Thread Andres Conrado
Tank you very much Pablo. I'll try that. They are proper latex fonts, tho, so I'm no sure that will do. I also have a background i humanities and book design, but I'm now making math books, go figure. It's very interesting from a typographic point of view. Now I'm more interested in seeing what

[NTG-context] luatex-fonts-merged.lua broken?

2019-06-25 Thread Ulrike Fischer
Hans, we think that luatex-fonts-merged.lua is broken: It contains in line 8594 return characters.indicgroups (from luatex-basics-chr.lua) and such a return statement is a problem in a merged file. -- Ulrike Fischer https://www.troubleshooting-tex.de/

Re: [NTG-context] issue with italic correction (again)

2019-06-25 Thread Taco Hoekwater
> Op 25 jun. 2019 om 21:42 heeft Pablo Rodriguez het volgende > geschreven: > > BTW, I wonder why the second definition of \DesiredFont doesn’t change > the font for the buffer used after it. Using \switchtobodyfont instead of \setupbodyfont for all except the first call should help. You

[NTG-context] issue with italic correction (again)

2019-06-25 Thread Pablo Rodriguez
Dear list, [sorry for insisting, but I have the impression that the previous version of this message went unnoticed.] I have the following sample: \def\DesiredFont{TeX Gyre Termes} \definefontfeature[italic][itlc=yes,textitalics=yes] \setupitaliccorrection[global, always]

Re: [NTG-context] is it useful to use the option "--fonts=all" when running first-setup-sh?

2019-06-25 Thread Pablo Rodriguez
On 6/23/19 10:53 PM, Andres Conrado wrote: > Thanks, Pablo. I am assuming I need to have Utopia installed in my usual > font folder. I tried with Erewhon (I have otf files for that) and it > works. Thank you. > > In a related note, is there any reasonable way to use the latex math > font /Math

Re: [NTG-context] [OT] rasperry 4

2019-06-25 Thread Rudolf Bahr
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 03:33:00PM +0200, luigi scarso wrote: > On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 3:31 PM Rudolf Bahr wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 10:15:29AM +1200, Henri Menke wrote: > > > On 25/06/19 12:30 AM, luigi scarso wrote: > > > > just seen > > > >

Re: [NTG-context] [OT] rasperry 4

2019-06-25 Thread luigi scarso
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 3:31 PM Rudolf Bahr wrote: > On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 10:15:29AM +1200, Henri Menke wrote: > > On 25/06/19 12:30 AM, luigi scarso wrote: > > > just seen > > > https://www.raspberrypi.org/products/raspberry-pi-4-model-b/ > > > > > > I would like to know your impressions > >

[NTG-context] [OT] rasperry 4

2019-06-25 Thread Rudolf Bahr
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 10:15:29AM +1200, Henri Menke wrote: > On 25/06/19 12:30 AM, luigi scarso wrote: > > just seen > > https://www.raspberrypi.org/products/raspberry-pi-4-model-b/ > > > > I would like to know your impressions > > Does it still need proprietary binary blobs in the kernel?

Re: [NTG-context] [OT] rasperry 4

2019-06-25 Thread Henri Menke
On 25/06/2019, 09:15:43, luigi scarso wrote: > On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 12:15 AM Henri Menke wrote: > > > On 25/06/19 12:30 AM, luigi scarso wrote: > > > just seen > > > https://www.raspberrypi.org/products/raspberry-pi-4-model-b/ > > > > > > I would like to know your impressions > > > > Does it

Re: [NTG-context] [OT] rasperry 4

2019-06-25 Thread luigi scarso
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 9:15 AM luigi scarso wrote: > > > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ARM/RaspberryPi > 18.04.2 both 32bit and 64bit work > > I mean in raspberry 3B & 3B+, pi4 is slightly different :

Re: [NTG-context] [OT] rasperry 4

2019-06-25 Thread luigi scarso
On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 12:15 AM Henri Menke wrote: > On 25/06/19 12:30 AM, luigi scarso wrote: > > just seen > > https://www.raspberrypi.org/products/raspberry-pi-4-model-b/ > > > > I would like to know your impressions > > Does it still need proprietary binary blobs in the kernel? dunno >