Re: [NTG-context] radiobuttons

2019-08-14 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Henning Hraban Ramm schrieb am 05.08.2019 um 15:10: Of course the behaviour depends on the PDF viewer… :-( In Acrobat Pro 9 the radiobuttons work while I highlight form fields; if I switch that off, all options are checked. In Adobe Reader DC you can’t switch off form field highlighting.

Re: [NTG-context] radiobuttons

2019-08-14 Thread Hans Hagen
On 8/13/2019 8:01 PM, Henning Hraban Ramm wrote: Regardless of my other mails, I’d appreciate to have this bug fixed. Last time I checked this (widget crap) there was an issue with acrobat and apearances ... I think that this model of parents and kids never really worked well and when one

Re: [NTG-context] metafun 2

2019-08-14 Thread Hans Hagen
On 8/14/2019 4:58 PM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote: 1) 3d support. This is of course a very big request, but it would also be useful for many people. yes ... Alan and I are thinking of some (not that we came far yet) 2) About graphing, it would be nice to be able to do contour polots and

Re: [NTG-context] metafun 2

2019-08-14 Thread Hans Hagen
On 8/14/2019 4:58 PM, Otared Kavian wrote: On 14 Aug 2019, at 16:53, Aditya Mahajan wrote: […] This looks like a typical .. vs -- issue. I think there is a way to change how the points are connected, but I'll have to look at the code again. Aditya Indeed, this seems the right

Re: [NTG-context] metafun 2

2019-08-14 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Otared Kavian schrieb am 14.08.2019 um 16:58: On 14 Aug 2019, at 16:53, Aditya Mahajan wrote: […] This looks like a typical .. vs -- issue. I think there is a way to change how the points are connected, but I'll have to look at the code again. Aditya Indeed, this seems the right

Re: [NTG-context] metafun 2

2019-08-14 Thread Mikael P. Sundqvist
On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 11:55 AM Hans Hagen wrote: > Hi, > > In the process of providing an additional (more abstract) interface to > some of the old and also new MetaFun code we wonder what kind of > features users would like to see. > >

Re: [NTG-context] metafun 2

2019-08-14 Thread Otared Kavian
> On 14 Aug 2019, at 16:53, Aditya Mahajan wrote: > > […] > This looks like a typical .. vs -- issue. I think there is a way to change > how the points are connected, but I'll have to look at the code again. > > Aditya Indeed, this seems the right explanation. @ Hans: would it be possible

Re: [NTG-context] metafun 2

2019-08-14 Thread Aditya Mahajan
On Wed, 14 Aug 2019, Otared Kavian wrote: Hi Hans, Thank you very much for the new features! I haven't yet read all the mag-1104-mkiv.pdf where you explain some of them, but after modifying one of your examples, I noticed that some funtions get a strange graph, which is probably due to the

Re: [NTG-context] metafun 2

2019-08-14 Thread Hans Hagen
On 8/14/2019 4:22 PM, Otared Kavian wrote: Hi Hans, Thank you very much for the new features! I haven't yet read all the mag-1104-mkiv.pdf where you explain some of them, but after modifying one of your examples, I noticed that some funtions get a strange graph, which is probably due to the

Re: [NTG-context] metafun 2

2019-08-14 Thread Otared Kavian
Hi Hans, Thank you very much for the new features! I haven't yet read all the mag-1104-mkiv.pdf where you explain some of them, but after modifying one of your examples, I noticed that some funtions get a strange graph, which is probably due to the fact that metafun2 is interpolating between

Re: [NTG-context] metafun 2

2019-08-14 Thread Hans Hagen
On 8/14/2019 1:31 PM, Floris van Manen wrote: where can i find the steps to install lmtx next to my current context luatex ? http://pragma-ade.nl/install.htm - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE

Re: [NTG-context] metafun 2

2019-08-14 Thread Floris van Manen
where can i find the steps to install lmtx next to my current context luatex ? .F pEpkey.asc Description: application/pgp-keys ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!

Re: [NTG-context] metafun 2

2019-08-14 Thread Hans Hagen
On 8/14/2019 12:18 PM, Henri Menke wrote: Dear Hans, I just wanted to ask, will LMTX and MetaFun remain valid implementations of TeX and MetaPost or do we have to expect incompatibilities? It depends on how you define 'valid' ... we're downward compatible ... but LMTX will use features

[NTG-context] ConTeXt Group Newsletter August 2019

2019-08-14 Thread Taco Hoekwater
In this newsletter: * 2018 journal progress * ConTeXt Meeting updates * Chaos Communication Camp * Board elections * Becoming a CG member = 2018 journal progress = Our next ConTeXt Group journal issue is printed! Printed copies will reside below my desk until the meeting. The Table of

Re: [NTG-context] metafun 2

2019-08-14 Thread Henri Menke
Dear Hans, I just wanted to ask, will LMTX and MetaFun remain valid implementations of TeX and MetaPost or do we have to expect incompatibilities? Cheers, Henri On 14/08/19 9:54 PM, Hans Hagen wrote: > Hi, > > In the process of providing an additional (more abstract) interface to > some of

[NTG-context] metafun 2

2019-08-14 Thread Hans Hagen
Hi, In the process of providing an additional (more abstract) interface to some of the old and also new MetaFun code we wonder what kind of features users would like to see. http://www.pragma-ade.com/general/magazines/mag-1104-mkiv.pdf As a teaser I uploaded a MyWay document that shows some