Hi,
There is a bug with \date in LMTX.
\starttext
\date[d=10]
\stoptext
does not change the date. Works okay in MKIV.
Thanks,
Aditya
___
If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to
Wolfgang wrote:
> The settings for the second columnset work when the first columnset goes over
> of two or more pages.
Thank you, now I understand the mechanism: only if the first columnset extends
to more than one page, the next \setupcolumnsetlines will work properly. Is
this a bug or a
Thank you, Denis and Wolfgang.
Wolfgang, your sentence
> No, you set relative numbers (I checked it) but the first columnset
> environment ends on the third page because you leave just enough
> space on the second page to fit the text which produces an empty
> third page.
is not clear to me.
If
Booklet layout 2UP is not working with lmtx for me.
MWE: under mkiv I get all 4 booklet pages laid out for two-sided print and fold.
\setuppapersize[A5][A4,landscape]
\setuparranging[2UP,doublesided]
\starttext
\dorecurse{4}{\input tufte \blank}
\dorecurse{3}{\input bryson \blank}
Hi Hans, Alan,
This is really cool! Not sure how I missed this feature, works exactly for
my use-case.
Thanks a lot for pointing this out, I was able to find it in the MAPS as
well.
Cheers,
Adam
On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 9:52 AM Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 8/17/2019 3:27 AM, Alan Braslau wrote:
> >
Denis Maier schrieb am 17.08.2019 um 17:49:
Ok.
With this I don't get the empty page. But the setupcolumnsetlines has
still no effecgt for the second environment.
===
\definecolumnset[One][n=2]
\setupcolumnsetlines[One][1][1][9]
\definecolumnset[Two][n=2]
Denis Maier schrieb am 17.08.2019 um 16:45:
Ok. So no need to load the module first. Good.
So the second argument is an absolute pagenumber, not relative to
where to columnset starts... But then, this here should work:
No, you set relative numbers (I checked it) but the first columnset
Denis Maier schrieb am 17.08.2019 um 15:50:
This here works for the first columnset, but not for the second one:
=
\usemodule[newcolumnsets]
The new code base is used by default and you don't have to load the module.
\definecolumnset[One][n=2]
This here works for the first columnset, but not for the second one:
=
\usemodule[newcolumnsets]
\definecolumnset[One][n=2]
\setupcolumnsetlines[One][1][1][9]
\setupcolumnsetlines[One][1][2][9]
\setupcolumnsetlines[One][2][1][9]
\setupcolumnsetlines[One][2][2][9]
Ok, have tried it now. No change ...
Am Sa., 17. Aug. 2019 um 13:33 Uhr schrieb Denis Maier :
> Also, what about \setupcolumnsetlines[Two][2][1][9]?
>
> Denis Maier schrieb am Sa., 17. Aug. 2019, 13:32:
>
>> If I am remembering correctly, the documentation has \setupcolumnsetlines
>> before
Hi all,
Because I received some email requests on whether registration is still open
for the ConTeXt meeting in Bassenge and what to do about day visits et cetera,
here is the nitty gritty on that:
* As of today, there is room left for 10 extra participants, so late
registrations
are still
Also, what about \setupcolumnsetlines[Two][2][1][9]?
Denis Maier schrieb am Sa., 17. Aug. 2019, 13:32:
> If I am remembering correctly, the documentation has \setupcolumnsetlines
> before \starttext.
>
> Sytse Knypstra schrieb am Sa., 17. Aug. 2019,
> 12:59:
>
>> In an effort to balance
If I am remembering correctly, the documentation has \setupcolumnsetlines
before \starttext.
Sytse Knypstra schrieb am Sa., 17. Aug. 2019,
12:59:
> In an effort to balance columns in a columnset layout, I found that in the
> following minimal example this effect is not obtained.
> After
In an effort to balance columns in a columnset layout, I found that in the
following minimal example this effect is not obtained.
After commenting out the first three lines after \starttext the result is ok.
I am wondering what I overlooked this time.
\definecolumnset[Two][n=2]
\starttext
On 8/17/2019 10:56 AM, Henri Menke wrote:
On 17/08/19 8:48 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
On 8/17/2019 9:19 AM, Henri Menke wrote:
Dear list,
According to the LuaTeX documentation:
“The \begincsname primitive is like \csname but doesn’t create a
relaxed equivalent when there is no such
On 17/08/19 8:48 PM, Hans Hagen wrote:
> On 8/17/2019 9:19 AM, Henri Menke wrote:
>> Dear list,
>>
>> According to the LuaTeX documentation:
>>
>> “The \begincsname primitive is like \csname but doesn’t create a
>> relaxed equivalent when there is no such name.”
>>
>> I thought it would
On 8/17/2019 3:27 AM, Alan Braslau wrote:
We have eofill in MP (in pdf/ps in fact) and that likely will do what you need.
You forgot the MWD (Minimal Working Demo):
\starttext
\startMPpage
path p ; p := fullcircle scaled 1cm ;
path q ; q := fullcircle scaled .5cm ;
nofill p ;
eofill q ;
On 8/17/2019 9:19 AM, Henri Menke wrote:
Dear list,
According to the LuaTeX documentation:
“The \begincsname primitive is like \csname but doesn’t create a
relaxed equivalent when there is no such name.”
I thought it would be possible to use this fact to skip the \relax-ed
Dear list,
According to the LuaTeX documentation:
“The \begincsname primitive is like \csname but doesn’t create a
relaxed equivalent when there is no such name.”
I thought it would be possible to use this fact to skip the \relax-ed
definition when \def-ining a new control sequence, but
19 matches
Mail list logo
