Re: [NTG-context] Second derivative ''

On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 9:09 PM Wolfgang Schuster < wolfgang.schuster.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > Mikael P. Sundqvist schrieb am 05.03.2020 um 20:48: > > Oh, I had not. It looks better with collapsing=1, indeed. A few neq > questions comes to me: > > Does ConTeXt not use the same prime character as

Re: [NTG-context] Second derivative ''

Mikael P. Sundqvist schrieb am 05.03.2020 um 20:48: Oh, I had not. It looks better with collapsing=1, indeed. A few neq questions comes to me: Does ConTeXt not use the same prime character as in TeX/LaTeX? Or has something changed in latin modern? See the attached pdf files (derivatives.pdf

Re: [NTG-context] Second derivative ''

On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 6:34 PM Hans Hagen wrote: > On 3/5/2020 5:41 PM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 5:36 PM Aditya Mahajan > > wrote: > > > > On Thu, 5 Mar 2020, Hans Hagen wrote: > > > > > On 3/4/2020 11:44 PM, Weber, Matthias wrote:

Re: [NTG-context] Second derivative ''

On 3/5/2020 5:41 PM, Mikael P. Sundqvist wrote: On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 5:36 PM Aditya Mahajan > wrote: On Thu, 5 Mar 2020, Hans Hagen wrote: > On 3/4/2020 11:44 PM, Weber, Matthias wrote: >> Dear List, >> >> \starttext >> \startformula

Re: [NTG-context] Second derivative ''

On 3/5/2020 5:36 PM, Aditya Mahajan wrote: On Thu, 5 Mar 2020, Hans Hagen wrote: On 3/4/2020 11:44 PM, Weber, Matthias wrote: Dear List, \starttext \startformula \left(f\right)'' = f'' \stopformula \stoptext has the second apostrophe set too low. This is in MKIV on ConTeXt live as well

Re: [NTG-context] Second derivative ''

On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 5:36 PM Aditya Mahajan wrote: > On Thu, 5 Mar 2020, Hans Hagen wrote: > > > On 3/4/2020 11:44 PM, Weber, Matthias wrote: > >> Dear List, > >> > >> \starttext > >> \startformula > >> \left(f\right)'' = f'' > >> \stopformula > >> \stoptext > >> > >> has the second apostrophe

Re: [NTG-context] Second derivative ''

On Thu, 5 Mar 2020, Hans Hagen wrote: On 3/4/2020 11:44 PM, Weber, Matthias wrote: Dear List, \starttext \startformula \left(f\right)'' = f'' \stopformula \stoptext has the second apostrophe set too low. This is in MKIV on ConTeXt live as well as in my slightly older version. What is the

Re: [NTG-context] Left hanging hyphen

Hi Wolfgang, # You can use the default language for the reset: # # \startsetups [language:czech] # \setbreakpoints [czcompound] # \stopsetups # # \startsetups [language:other] # \resetbreakpoints # \stopsetups # # \setuplanguage # [cz] # [setups=language:czech] # # \setuplanguage #

Re: [NTG-context] Second derivative ''

On 3/5/2020 10:12 AM, Hans Hagen wrote: On 3/4/2020 11:44 PM, Weber, Matthias wrote: Dear List, \starttext \startformula \left(f\right)'' = f'' \stopformula \stoptext has the second apostrophe set too low. This is in MKIV on ConTeXt live as well as in my slightly older version. What is the

Re: [NTG-context] unwanted with epub

I was wrong. The \penalty is not the culprit, but it turns out to be the \Word macro that introduces the through a parfillskip_code in the internal list. dr. Hans van der Meer > On 5 Mar 2020, at 09:33, Hans van der Meer wrote: > > Found the cause in my case: a \penalty0 statement. > >

Re: [NTG-context] Second derivative ''

On 3/4/2020 11:44 PM, Weber, Matthias wrote: Dear List, \starttext \startformula \left(f\right)'' = f'' \stopformula \stoptext has the second apostrophe set too low. This is in MKIV on ConTeXt live as well as in my slightly older version. What is the “right” way to typeset a second

Re: [NTG-context] Capitalize first word of first line within \startlines

On 3/5/2020 2:46 AM, Thangalin wrote: If it helps, here's why I thought it would work: https://wiki.contextgarden.net/Command/definefirstline The wiki page shows that the macro takes a style option. The style option links to: https://wiki.contextgarden.net/Style_Alternatives This page has a

Re: [NTG-context] unwanted with epub

Found the cause in my case: a \penalty0 statement. dr. Hans van der Meer > On 5 Mar 2020, at 03:08, Rik Kabel wrote: > > > > On 3/3/2020 16:51, Hans van der Meer wrote: >> In producing epub s are appearing (on the -raw.xml file) that are >> unwanted and seem spurious to me. For example