On Sunday, February 6, 2022 12:58:06 AM IST Michael Urban via ntg-context
wrote:
> Do I need a newer version of ConTeXt, or am I doing something wrong?
> Fonts in ConTeXt are always perilous, alas. For me, anyway.
(pre)loading the typescripts 'fixes' the issue.
\usebodyfont[termes]
See
I am experiencing an odd behavior switching text styles in a defined startstop
group ("blockquote"). I get different behavior depending on whether the
switchtobodyfont in the startstop definition includes the dummy {\it } and {\bf
} text. If they are not there, the italic and boldface
On Sat, Feb 05, 2022 at 03:18:08PM +0100, luigi scarso wrote:
>
>
> Following
> https://www.pdfa.org/wp-content/until2016_uploads/2011/08/pdfa_metadata-2b.pdf
> I think we should replace
> Text
> with
> Lang Alt
>
> --
> luigi
Yes, if a custom schema is needed at all (from what I can see, the
On Sat, Feb 5, 2022 at 1:33 PM luigi scarso wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 5, 2022 at 1:28 PM Karl Pettersson
> wrote:
>
>>
>> >
>> > From what I understand, ConTeXt applies a custom Dublin Core schema
>> > containing just a redefinition of dc:description, which is not coherent
>> > with how
You’re invited to join next Tuesday, February 8th, 15:00 CET (UTC+1)
at https://lecture.senfcall.de/hen-rbr-rku-oke
ConTeXt users of all levels are welcome!
Hans offered to give a Q session again – please announce subjects
you’d like to discuss ASAP, so that he can prepare.
Regarding the
On Sat, Feb 5, 2022 at 1:28 PM Karl Pettersson
wrote:
>
> >
> > From what I understand, ConTeXt applies a custom Dublin Core schema
> > containing just a redefinition of dc:description, which is not coherent
> > with how dc:description is written by the application.
> >
> > This patch to
>
> From what I understand, ConTeXt applies a custom Dublin Core schema
> containing just a redefinition of dc:description, which is not coherent
> with how dc:description is written by the application.
>
> This patch to lpdf-pda.xml removes the validation error.
>
Sorry, diff the other way
On Sat, Feb 05, 2022 at 09:59:44AM +0100, luigi scarso wrote:
> it's not redefined -- it's dropped. And this is ok.
> You can also check with
> FOO
>
>
> TITLE
>
>
> and again it's valid.
> But
>
On Sat, Feb 5, 2022 at 9:48 AM Karl Pettersson
wrote:
>
> Attach metadata xml for the non-validating and validating example
> (extraced with `pdfinfo -meta | xmllint format -`) in the
> Github issue.
>
> Here is a reference to the description element. Note that only
> description seems to be
On Sat, Feb 05, 2022 at 12:37:44AM +0100, luigi scarso via ntg-context wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 4, 2022 at 11:11 PM Karl Pettersson via ntg-context <
> ntg-context@ntg.nl> wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Feb 04, 2022 at 10:25:27PM +0100, Hans Hagen via ntg-context wrote:
> > > On 2/4/2022 7:29 PM, Karl
10 matches
Mail list logo
