Re: [NTG-context] Quick way to proofread / check index entries?

2022-09-04 Thread Bruce Horrocks via ntg-context
> On 3 Sep 2022, at 19:51, Bruce Horrocks via ntg-context > wrote: > > My own fault for not thinking head :-) but I have a largeish text with a lot > of \index{...} entries. To make life easier for the proofreader I would like > to temporarily redefine \index to wrap it or replace it with

Re: [NTG-context] zint module on LMTX

2022-09-04 Thread Ivan Pešić via ntg-context
Hi Michal and Hans, My LuaMetaTeX version (and ConTeXt LMTX...) was from 18.04.2022. That was the reason... As soon as I installed the fresh version, it started working properly, even with my library build. So next time before writing to list, I'll do the update and check first ;) That is a

Re: [NTG-context] zint module on LMTX

2022-09-04 Thread Michal Vlasák via ntg-context
On Sun Sep 4, 2022 at 1:25 PM CEST, Hans Hagen via ntg-context wrote: > although i don't like top do it i cloned the zint repos and tried to > compile (after migrating the proj file to vs2022) but it fails on some > png.h file missing and i see no way to disable png) Sorry, I don't have native

Re: [NTG-context] zint module on LMTX

2022-09-04 Thread Hans Hagen via ntg-context
On 9/4/2022 12:59 PM, Michal Vlasák via ntg-context wrote: The aspiration was that this repository would pin the "known to work versions" of optional libraries and prepare build instructions for them. But it is now largely untested. I can only say that zint works, as I haven't tried others in a

Re: [NTG-context] zint module on LMTX

2022-09-04 Thread Hans Hagen via ntg-context
On 9/4/2022 12:59 PM, Michal Vlasák via ntg-context wrote: The aspiration was that this repository would pin the "known to work versions" of optional libraries and prepare build instructions for them. But it is now largely untested. I can only say that zint works, as I haven't tried others in a

Re: [NTG-context] zint module on LMTX

2022-09-04 Thread Hans Hagen via ntg-context
On 9/4/2022 11:59 AM, Ivan Pešić via ntg-context wrote: Дана 04.09.2022. у 12:36, ntg-context-requ...@ntg.nl пише: looks like the library is loaded ... so what is your test we don't do png, we do outlines (actually native zint graphic structures that we then convert with mp) Hans Hi

Re: [NTG-context] zint module on LMTX

2022-09-04 Thread Michal Vlasák via ntg-context
On Sun Sep 4, 2022 at 11:59 AM CEST, Ivan Pešić via ntg-context wrote: > Дана 04.09.2022. у 12:36, ntg-context-requ...@ntg.nl пише: > > looks like the library is loaded ... so what is your test > > we don't do png, we do outlines (actually native zint graphic structures > that we then convert

Re: [NTG-context] zint module on LMTX

2022-09-04 Thread Ivan Pešić via ntg-context
Дана 04.09.2022. у 12:36, ntg-context-requ...@ntg.nl пише: looks like the library is loaded ... so what is your test we don't do png, we do outlines (actually native zint graphic structures that we then convert with mp) Hans Hi Hans, here is the example that I used, basically I took it

Re: [NTG-context] zint module on LMTX

2022-09-04 Thread Hans Hagen via ntg-context
On 9/4/2022 1:36 AM, Ivan Pešić via ntg-context wrote: Hi Pablo, I'm resurrecting this thread, as I've just managed to get some progress on Windows with zint in LMTX. The thing is that you need 64-bit DLL, because LuaMetaTex is built for 64-bit architecture on Windows. As it is not available,

Re: [NTG-context] Quick way to proofread / check index entries?

2022-09-04 Thread Mikael Sundqvist via ntg-context
Den sön 4 sep. 2022 08:59Richard Mahoney via ntg-context skrev: > Bruce, > > Did something of the sort a while back: redefined the index command to > something short, in capitals; then adjusted the syntax highlighting to pick > up the code. This was for emacs + auctex, so it was just a case of >

Re: [NTG-context] Quick way to proofread / check index entries?

2022-09-04 Thread Richard Mahoney via ntg-context
Bruce, Did something of the sort a while back: redefined the index command to something short, in capitals; then adjusted the syntax highlighting to pick up the code. This was for emacs + auctex, so it was just a case of adjusting one of the stock auctex files. I think Scite may let one do