Re: [NTG-context] fallbacks

2023-04-24 Thread Sylvain Hubert via ntg-context
I believe it's a bug. https://github.com/contextgarden/context/blob/d025bcdf995be6951f69fed6869048ab22491b9e/tex/context/base/mkxl/font-col.lmt#L278 the newchar[] table, which should contain all chars supported by the fallback termes font if I'm not mistaken, turns out to have only 392 chars

Re: [NTG-context] adjustment to my local footnotes problem

2023-04-24 Thread Henning Hraban Ramm via ntg-context
Am 24.04.23 um 11:21 schrieb jbf via ntg-context: Well, Hraban, you say that \directsetup makes no sense any more in LMTX, but in this caseĀ  (I use LMTX, not MKIV) I tried it without \directsetup, it did not work and furthermore I got an error. That is why I commented that I did not understand

Re: [NTG-context] adjustment to my local footnotes problem

2023-04-24 Thread jbf via ntg-context
Well, Hraban, you say that \directsetup makes no sense any more in LMTX, but in this caseĀ  (I use LMTX, not MKIV) I tried it without \directsetup, it did not work and furthermore I got an error. That is why I commented that I did not understand what \directsetup really does (or doesn't do as

Re: [NTG-context] adjustment to my local footnotes problem

2023-04-24 Thread Henning Hraban Ramm via ntg-context
Am 23.04.23 um 23:36 schrieb jbf via ntg-context: I tried all those Hraban, unsuccessfully, but finally 'happened' upon a solution by trying whitespace instead in the setups. Except that I had read somewhere in the mailing list (Pablo I think) that I would need to use \directsetup. I don't