Den tis 30 jan. 2024 09:06Henning Hraban Ramm skrev:
> Am 29.01.24 um 21:45 schrieb jbf:
> > And indeed this is the best solution I could find, though it obviously
> > meant that something like '29 April 2017' was no good for sorting on...
> > it has to be the US date format YY-MM-DD
>
> How did
Am 29.01.24 um 21:45 schrieb jbf:
And indeed this is the best solution I could find, though it obviously
meant that something like '29 April 2017' was no good for sorting on...
it has to be the US date format YY-MM-DD
How did you expect a simple sorting algorithm to sort by verbose dates?
