Marcin Borkowski mbork at atos.wmid.amu.edu.pl writes:
Dnia Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 05:14:49PM -0600, Idris Samawi Hamid ادريس سماوي
حامد napisa#322;(a):
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 09:27:09 -0600, Bruce D'Arcus
bdarcus.lists at gmail.com wrote:
c) that there's no reason at all to make a
Wolfgang Schuster schuster.wolfgang at googlemail.com writes:
Am 24.03.2009 um 16:27 schrieb Bruce D'Arcus:
As for how to do it, I could imagine using the wiki. But I could also
imagine some other approach, like someone starting a project on
GitHub or
something similar.
I did
Taco Hoekwater taco at elvenkind.com writes:
[snip]
But the few times I've had to work with TEI stuff I found that you
can easily get much more than you bargained for. Bibliographic data
is not easy on its own, and a format that allows (almost promotes)
extra tags to be embedded also is not
Hans Hagen pragma at wxs.nl writes:
since we're talking databases here, i think the focus should be on what
kind of (intermediate) format suits typesetting best (could be different
from the databse structure)
There may be trade-offs, but if you get too typesetting-oriented,
you cause
