Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Conceptually, the .bib format does not really exist where the module
is involved. I consider the .bbl file to be the actual source
database (this is why there is a \usepublications command).
If someone doesn't want the 1995a item in the bbl, just delete it
for the bbl file
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
You need 'num' in both, or 'number' in both.
...as simple as that ?
Great.
I can only suggest that I was drawn to:
refcommand=number
setupcite[num]
because specifically these are suggested (albeit not as a combination) in the
readme. In the
I suppose that, as usual, I am missing something obvious or simple. However,
AFAICS it hasn't been discussed recently and isn't mentioned on the XeTeX wiki
pages, so...
What is the procedure for invoking bibtex as part of a XeConTeXt process ? I
can't get this to work.
If I run:
Adam Lindsay wrote:
Mark Smith said this at Fri, 11 Mar 2005 14:56:06 +0100:
The problem is that bibtex can't read the .aux file that is generated
by xextex.
Okay, can we see a copy (or reduction) of that file, then?
Hmm... Interesting. In preparing a short and highly sanitized file
I wrote:
Any tips about what I might look for ?
Unbelievable. Now all three original files are processing fine in their
entirety.
I DID NOT CHANGE ANYTHING.
Very strange.
Does anything get written outside of the current directory during a run ?
Glad everything is *currently* working, but I
Apart from my reference numbering problem with the bib module,
everything was working OK. So, I decided it was time to have a go with
XeConTeXt.
I was following Adam's instructions here:
http://contextgarden.net/XeTeX
Checked:
Otared Kavian wrote:
Hi,
Actually you don't need anymore to edit the file as stated in
contextgarden (as far as I understood, Dalyoung on the XeTeX list is
going to put the appropriate procedure on the wiki there).
This is how I did for the update of XeConTeXt...
[...]
and Adam Lindsay
This came up a while back...
Taco Hoekwater wrote:
Fei He wrote:
1. \setupcite[number][left=[, right=]] did not work. the citation
still shows up in the text like (author, year)
In this case, you also need \setuppublications[refcommand=number],
to change the default alternative for \cite.
Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
Uwe Koloska [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let's count the guys that use OSX with ConTeXt (and possibly
i-Packages):
-- One --
-- Two --
-- Three --
___
ntg-context mailing list
ntg-context@ntg.nl
Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
I'd like to, but there's no german Acrobat 7 yet, and I won't buy an
english one.
Interesting. I'm in Germany too and am currently having trouble getting an
international English version of 7 Pro at the education price. A German one is
on offer.
Steffen Wolfrum wrote:
Hi,
in the MacOSX-TeX-list (mainly on LaTeX) I just read a discussion on
Comments in PDF (by AcrobatReader7).
I was involved in that discussion.
Do we have a ConTeXt tool which can enable users of e.g. AdobeReader 7 to
add comments to PDF files ?
Or is it true that
I wrote:
(regarding enabling comments in PDFs)
I wonder if either (or both) of these:
http://shop.pdf-office.com/product_info.php?products_id=34osCsid=
a1241e335670fc0b939a8c03b77536f2
http://shop.pdf-office.com/product_info.php?products_id=47osCsid=
a1241e335670fc0b939a8c03b77536f2
allow it
Henning Hraban Ramm wrote:
Am 05.01.2005 um 12:03 schrieb Mark Smith:
The general opinion was that this is effectively an Acrobat-only
feature. In fact, it seems that one needs Acrobat 6 or 7 Pro to enable
commenting in this way and that (at least on Mac) the commmenting
author needs
13 matches
Mail list logo
