Re: [NTG-context] (MkVI) Regression in named parameters, TL2013 to current

2014-03-01 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 01.03.2014 um 04:39 schrieb Rik Kabel cont...@rik.users.panix.com: And as I wrote in the first note, accepting non-letters (that is, other than the basic unaccented Aa–Zz) makes delimited parameter patterns difficult to use with Mark VI parameter names. Thus, we have the situation

Re: [NTG-context] (MkVI) Regression in named parameters, TL2013 to current

2014-03-01 Thread Rik Kabel
On 2014-03-01 04:59, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: Am 01.03.2014 um 04:39 schrieb Rik Kabel cont...@rik.users.panix.com mailto:cont...@rik.users.panix.com: And as I wrote in the first note, accepting non-letters (that is, other than the basic unaccented Aa--Zz) makes delimited parameter

[NTG-context] (MkVI) Regression in named parameters, TL2013 to current

2014-02-28 Thread Rik Kabel
% macros=mkvi \setupwhitespace[small] \def\ä^?z{Ä^?} \def\Named[#PARAMETERNAME]{¦#PARAMETERNAME¦} \def\Numbered[#1]{¦#1¦} \starttext \subject{Regression between TL2013 and current beta} There does appear to have been some change or regression in the definition of allowed characters in

Re: [NTG-context] (MkVI) Regression in named parameters, TL2013 to current

2014-02-28 Thread Hans Hagen
On 3/1/2014 12:45 AM, Rik Kabel wrote: % macros=mkvi \setupwhitespace[small] \def\ä^?z{Ä^?} only letters can make a \cs (not symbols) - Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE

Re: [NTG-context] (MkVI) Regression in named parameters, TL2013 to current

2014-02-28 Thread Rik Kabel
On 2014-02-28 20:32, Hans Hagen wrote: On 3/1/2014 12:45 AM, Rik Kabel wrote: % macros=mkvi \setupwhitespace[small] \def\ä^?z{Ä^?} only letters can make a \cs (not symbols) Clearly this is not currently the case, although I would agree that it should be. Is there any way to enforce it?