Re: [NTG-context] [OT] rasperry 4

On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 2:30 PM luigi scarso wrote: > just seen > https://www.raspberrypi.org/products/raspberry-pi-4-model-b/ > > I would like to know your impressions > > -- > luigi > more benchmarks https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/raspberry-pi-4-b,6193.html -- luigi

Re: [NTG-context] [OT] rasperry 4

On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 03:33:00PM +0200, luigi scarso wrote: > On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 3:31 PM Rudolf Bahr wrote: > > > On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 10:15:29AM +1200, Henri Menke wrote: > > > On 25/06/19 12:30 AM, luigi scarso wrote: > > > > just seen > > > >

Re: [NTG-context] [OT] rasperry 4

On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 3:31 PM Rudolf Bahr wrote: > On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 10:15:29AM +1200, Henri Menke wrote: > > On 25/06/19 12:30 AM, luigi scarso wrote: > > > just seen > > > https://www.raspberrypi.org/products/raspberry-pi-4-model-b/ > > > > > > I would like to know your impressions > >

[NTG-context] [OT] rasperry 4

On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 10:15:29AM +1200, Henri Menke wrote: > On 25/06/19 12:30 AM, luigi scarso wrote: > > just seen > > https://www.raspberrypi.org/products/raspberry-pi-4-model-b/ > > > > I would like to know your impressions > > Does it still need proprietary binary blobs in the kernel?

Re: [NTG-context] [OT] rasperry 4

On 25/06/2019, 09:15:43, luigi scarso wrote: > On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 12:15 AM Henri Menke wrote: > > > On 25/06/19 12:30 AM, luigi scarso wrote: > > > just seen > > > https://www.raspberrypi.org/products/raspberry-pi-4-model-b/ > > > > > > I would like to know your impressions > > > > Does it

Re: [NTG-context] [OT] rasperry 4

On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 9:15 AM luigi scarso wrote: > > > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ARM/RaspberryPi > 18.04.2 both 32bit and 64bit work > > I mean in raspberry 3B & 3B+, pi4 is slightly different :

Re: [NTG-context] [OT] rasperry 4

On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 12:15 AM Henri Menke wrote: > On 25/06/19 12:30 AM, luigi scarso wrote: > > just seen > > https://www.raspberrypi.org/products/raspberry-pi-4-model-b/ > > > > I would like to know your impressions > > Does it still need proprietary binary blobs in the kernel? dunno >

Re: [NTG-context] [OT] rasperry 4

On 25/06/19 12:30 AM, luigi scarso wrote: > just seen > https://www.raspberrypi.org/products/raspberry-pi-4-model-b/ > > I would like to know your impressions Does it still need proprietary binary blobs in the kernel? Probably yes, so it is as useless as all the models before because it can

Re: [NTG-context] [OT] rasperry 4

On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 19:58:54 +0200 Hans Hagen wrote: > On 6/24/2019 6:41 PM, Alan Braslau wrote: > > On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 14:30:48 +0200 > > luigi scarso wrote: > > > >> just seen > >> https://www.raspberrypi.org/products/raspberry-pi-4-model-b/ > >> > >> I would like to know your impressions

Re: [NTG-context] [OT] rasperry 4

On 6/24/2019 6:41 PM, Alan Braslau wrote: On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 14:30:48 +0200 luigi scarso wrote: just seen https://www.raspberrypi.org/products/raspberry-pi-4-model-b/ I would like to know your impressions No SDIO stack (yet) on FreeBSD, so no WIFI support on the Raspberry Pi. (so one is

Re: [NTG-context] [OT] rasperry 4

On 6/24/2019 2:30 PM, luigi scarso wrote: just seen https://www.raspberrypi.org/products/raspberry-pi-4-model-b/ I would like to know your impressions "Raspberry Pi 4 Desktop Kit will remain in production until at least January 2026" so that sounds nice ... i noticed that in electronics

Re: [NTG-context] [OT] rasperry 4

On Mon, 24 Jun 2019 14:30:48 +0200 luigi scarso wrote: > just seen > https://www.raspberrypi.org/products/raspberry-pi-4-model-b/ > > I would like to know your impressions > No SDIO stack (yet) on FreeBSD, so no WIFI support on the Raspberry Pi. (so one is somewhat *stuck* with GNU/linux).

[NTG-context] [OT] rasperry 4

just seen https://www.raspberrypi.org/products/raspberry-pi-4-model-b/ I would like to know your impressions -- luigi ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki!