Re: [NTG-context] [fontloader] positioning of diacritics

2014-12-15 Thread Hans Hagen
On 12/15/2014 8:08 AM, Philipp Gesang wrote: Good morning! This report by Github user SverreStausland has been lingering on the Luaotfload tracker for a while: There appears to be a difference between how certain faces of the Libertine family handle the placement of diacritics. With Version

Re: [NTG-context] [fontloader] positioning of diacritics

2014-12-15 Thread Philipp Gesang
···date: 2014-12-15, Monday···from: Hans Hagen··· On 12/15/2014 8:08 AM, Philipp Gesang wrote: Good morning! This report by Github user SverreStausland has been lingering on the Luaotfload tracker for a while: There appears to be a difference between how certain faces of the Libertine

Re: [NTG-context] [fontloader] positioning of diacritics

2014-12-15 Thread Herbert Voss
Am 15.12.2014 um 21:43 schrieb Philipp Gesang: \enabletrackers[otf.bugs] Thanks for the reply and for the pointer. That tracker is indeed pretty handy! I attempted to open a bug report on the Libertine tracker but Sourceforge refuses to cooperate :/ Maybe next time. As far as I know there

Re: [NTG-context] [fontloader] positioning of diacritics

2014-12-15 Thread Philipp Gesang
···date: 2014-12-15, Monday···from: Herbert Voss··· Am 15.12.2014 um 21:43 schrieb Philipp Gesang: \enabletrackers[otf.bugs] Thanks for the reply and for the pointer. That tracker is indeed pretty handy! I attempted to open a bug report on the Libertine tracker but Sourceforge

[NTG-context] [fontloader] positioning of diacritics

2014-12-14 Thread Philipp Gesang
Good morning! This report by Github user SverreStausland has been lingering on the Luaotfload tracker for a while: There appears to be a difference between how certain faces of the Libertine family handle the placement of diacritics. With Version 5.1.2 of the family [0], the RZI version