Re: [NTG-context] \everymath

Am 16.09.2012 um 01:32 schrieb Rogers, Michael K mrog...@emory.edu: I often want every math mode (between single $) be \displaystyle. In Plain TeX, you do something like \everymath={\displaystyle} Is the best ConTeXt way to do something like this?

[NTG-context] \everymath

I often want every math mode (between single $) be \displaystyle. In Plain TeX, you do something like \everymath={\displaystyle} Is the best ConTeXt way to do something like this? \appendtoks\displaystyle\to\everymathematics Or is there a key in \setupmathematics? Thanks, Michael

[NTG-context] \everymath problem

Hi, I use luatex 0.43 with yesterday's beta. Running \everymath = {\displaystyle} \starttext ${a\over b}$ \stoptext results in ! Use of \dospecialabout doesn't match its definition. l.4 ${a\over b }$ Plain format under luatex has no problem here. If I

Re: [NTG-context] \everymath problem

Eythan Weg wrote: Hi, I use luatex 0.43 with yesterday's beta. Running \everymath = {\displaystyle} \starttext ${a\over b}$ \stoptext results in ! Use of \dospecialabout doesn't match its definition. l.4 ${a\over b }$ Plain format under luatex has

Re: [NTG-context] \everymath problem

Am 19.08.2009 um 16:47 schrieb Hans Hagen: Eythan Weg wrote: Hi, I use luatex 0.43 with yesterday's beta. Running\everymath = {\displaystyle} \starttext ${a\over b}$ \stoptext results in ! Use of \dospecialabout doesn't match its definition. l.4 ${a\over b }$

Re: [NTG-context] \everymath and ' accent

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi everyone, This topic has already been discussed on the list, but I didn't clearly understand the conclusion, so I'm asking again... It is not clear to me why the following \everymath{\displaystyle} \starttext \startformula \frac{1}{A'} \stopformula