Hello,
On Tue, 21 Apr 2015 00:38:18 +0200, Wolfgang Schuster
schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com wrote:
The \setupheads command is only a synonym for \setuphead but there can be a
difference between
\setuphead[..,..=..,..]
and
\setuphead[section][..,..=..,..]
Wolfgang
confirmed:
Am 21.04.2015 um 08:55 schrieb Procházka Lukáš Ing. - Pontex s. r. o.
l...@pontex.cz:
Hello,
On Tue, 21 Apr 2015 00:38:18 +0200, Wolfgang Schuster
schuster.wolfg...@gmail.com wrote:
The \setupheads command is only a synonym for \setuphead but there can be a
difference between
Am 20.04.2015 um 20:43 schrieb Lukáš Procházka l...@pontex.cz:
Hello Pablo,
\setupheads doesn't work for this - see the test:
\setupheads[distance=1in]
\setuphead[subsection][distance=2in]
\starttext
\section{Sec}
\subsection{Subsec}
\stoptext
Subsection has
Hello Pablo,
\setupheads doesn't work for this - see the test:
\setupheads[distance=1in]
\setuphead[subsection][distance=2in]
\starttext
\section{Sec}
\subsection{Subsec}
\stoptext
Subsection has the specified distance of 1 in, whilst the section doesn't.
Section was altered
On 04/20/2015 08:43 PM, Lukáš Procházka wrote:
Hello Pablo,
\setupheads doesn't work for this - see the test:
Hi Lukáš,
sorry, I thought that the plural of \setup... had the same options than
its singular form. My fault, since I was totally wrong.
I agree that it would be useful to have the
Hello,
is there a way to affect (setup) all sections that have been defined, like:
\setuphead[*][distance=1.5em]
instead of:
\setuphead[part,chapter,section,subsection,subsubsection][distance=1.5em]
The latter way needs to know all section names;
the former way allows to
On 04/17/2015 12:00 PM, Procházka Lukáš Ing. - Pontex s. r. o. wrote:
Hello,
is there a way to affect (setup) all sections that have been defined, like:
\setuphead[*][distance=1.5em]
instead of:
