Hello,
I know that people would usually use \type{em...@address.com}, but I
must be missing something. Is there really no \textat (under some
other name) defined anywhere in ConTeXt?
The following definition in ec (and probably some other encodings) as
well as in char-def.lua
On 14-2-2010 14:30, Mojca Miklavec wrote:
I know that people would usually use \type{em...@address.com}, but I
must be missing something. Is there really no \textat (under some
other name) defined anywhere in ConTeXt?
well, @ normally works quite ok so i never felt the need for a \textat
(or
Am 14.02.10 14:30, schrieb Mojca Miklavec:
Hello,
I know that people would usually use \type{em...@address.com}, but I
must be missing something. Is there really no \textat (under some
other name) defined anywhere in ConTeXt?
Why, you can just write @ in your text.
Wolfgang