Re: [NTG-context] ... and emoticons

On Mon 21 Mar 2011, Philipp A. wrote: > oh, i guess you’d like to file a bug request for this. it’s quite > useful and has no drawbacks at all. Well, the drawback is that it takes up a key combination :-). For example, in the US-international dead-key layout, AltGr+. applies an overdot diacritic

Re: [NTG-context] ... and emoticons

2011/3/21 Cecil Westerhof > 2011/3/20 Philipp A. > >> On modern Linux distributions, there is support for the ellipsis (…) on >> the keyboard layout; The combination is [AltGr+.] >> > > Not all. In openSUSE that is not the case. I made it for myself. I have a > file > /SharedFunctions/Xmodma

Re: [NTG-context] ... and emoticons

2011/3/20 Philipp A. > On modern Linux distributions, there is support for the ellipsis (…) on the > keyboard layout; The combination is [AltGr+.] > Not all. In openSUSE that is not the case. I made it for myself. I have a file /SharedFunctions/Xmodmap.extra which I use with: xmodmap /Sh

Re: [NTG-context] ... and emoticons

Am 20.03.2011 um 14:51 schrieb Philipp A.: > On modern Linux distributions, there is support for the ellipsis (…) on the > keyboard layout; The combination is [AltGr+.] > > On Windows, there is at least Microsoft KLC. While the possibilities are > inferior, simple key combinations like the one

Re: [NTG-context] ... and emoticons

On modern Linux distributions, there is support for the ellipsis (…) on the keyboard layout; The combination is [AltGr+.] On Windows, there is at least Microsoft KLC. While the possibilities are inferior

Re: [NTG-context] ... and emoticons

Am 19.03.2011 um 09:21 schrieb Mojca Miklavec:If font supports the emoticons in the first place, one could alsodefine ligatures to create them automatically with    :-)etc. But personally I would prefer to use \externalfigure and findsome really nice images out there as opposed to using whatever li

Re: [NTG-context] ... and emoticons

On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 04:15, Aditya Mahajan wrote: > On Sat, 19 Mar 2011, Cecil Westerhof wrote: > >> Are there codes for ... and emoticons in ConTeXt? > > \setupbodyfont[libertine] > \starttext > \unknown\ or \ldots > ☺☹ > \stoptext If font supports the emoticons in the first place, one could a

Re: [NTG-context] ... and emoticons

2011/3/19 Aditya Mahajan > On Sat, 19 Mar 2011, Cecil Westerhof wrote: > > 2011/3/19 Aditya Mahajan >> >> On Sat, 19 Mar 2011, Cecil Westerhof wrote: >>> >>> Are there codes for ... and emoticons in ConTeXt? >>> >>> \setupbodyfont[libertine] >>> \starttext >>> \unknown\ or \ldots >>

Re: [NTG-context] ... and emoticons

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011, Cecil Westerhof wrote: 2011/3/19 Aditya Mahajan On Sat, 19 Mar 2011, Cecil Westerhof wrote: Are there codes for ... and emoticons in ConTeXt? \setupbodyfont[libertine] \starttext \unknown\ or \ldots Works. What is the difference between \unknown\ and \ldots? \l

Re: [NTG-context] ... and emoticons

2011/3/19 Aditya Mahajan > On Sat, 19 Mar 2011, Cecil Westerhof wrote: > > Are there codes for ... and emoticons in ConTeXt? >> > > \setupbodyfont[libertine] > \starttext > \unknown\ or \ldots > Works. What is the difference between \unknown\ and \ldots? > ☺☹ > Does not work at the moment. I

Re: [NTG-context] ... and emoticons

On Sat, 19 Mar 2011, Cecil Westerhof wrote: Are there codes for ... and emoticons in ConTeXt? \setupbodyfont[libertine] \starttext \unknown\ or \ldots ☺☹ \stoptext Aditya___ If your question is of interest to othe

[NTG-context] ... and emoticons

Are there codes for ... and emoticons in ConTeXt? -- Cecil Westerhof ___ If your question is of interest to others as well, please add an entry to the Wiki! maillist : ntg-context@ntg.nl / http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/