Re: [NTG-context] 2 further unix stubs

2008-01-15 Thread Peter Münster
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 11:54:43AM +0100, Hans Hagen wrote: > > > > What about mtxrun and luatools, they are stubs today. Will that change? > > Peter > > this is mostly up to distributions >From now on I use your stubs in my simplistic texlive-package, that is getting even simpler today: chmod

Re: [NTG-context] 2 further unix stubs

2008-01-15 Thread Hans Hagen
Peter Münster wrote: > On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 10:43:17AM +0100, Hans Hagen wrote: >>> But texmfstart seems to be an exception, I'll just keep my symbolic link. >> sounds ok to me ... >> >> texmfstart, mtxrun, luatools : copies or symlinks >> >> the res: stubs > > What about mtxrun and luatools, t

Re: [NTG-context] 2 further unix stubs

2008-01-15 Thread Peter Münster
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 10:43:17AM +0100, Hans Hagen wrote: > > > But texmfstart seems to be an exception, I'll just keep my symbolic link. > > sounds ok to me ... > > texmfstart, mtxrun, luatools : copies or symlinks > > the res: stubs What about mtxrun and luatools, they are stubs today. Wil

Re: [NTG-context] 2 further unix stubs

2008-01-15 Thread Hans Hagen
Peter Münster wrote: > But texmfstart seems to be an exception, I'll just keep my symbolic link. sounds ok to me ... texmfstart, mtxrun, luatools : copies or symlinks the res: stubs (btw, for mtxrun related scripts, this is quite efficient because mtxrun already loads the file databases and

Re: [NTG-context] 2 further unix stubs

2008-01-15 Thread Hans Hagen
Mojca Miklavec wrote: > On Jan 15, 2008 12:17 AM, Peter Münster wrote: >> Hello, >> >> What about these 2 new stubs: >> >> stubs/unix/texmfstart: >> >> #!/bin/sh >> script=$(dirname $0)/../../ruby/texmfstart.rb >> exec $script "$@" >> # (or exec ruby $script "$@") > > texmfstart is usually "copy t

Re: [NTG-context] 2 further unix stubs

2008-01-15 Thread Peter Münster
On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 12:43:35AM +0100, Mojca Miklavec wrote: > > texmfstart is usually "copy texmfstart.rb to texmfstart in bin and > make it executable". The drawback is that if something changes, it > needs to be updated in the bin folder as well. Hello Mojca, that's why a stub is useful.

Re: [NTG-context] 2 further unix stubs

2008-01-14 Thread Mojca Miklavec
On Jan 15, 2008 12:17 AM, Peter Münster wrote: > Hello, > > What about these 2 new stubs: > > stubs/unix/texmfstart: > > #!/bin/sh > script=$(dirname $0)/../../ruby/texmfstart.rb > exec $script "$@" > # (or exec ruby $script "$@") texmfstart is usually "copy texmfstart.rb to texmfstart in bin and

[NTG-context] 2 further unix stubs

2008-01-14 Thread Peter Münster
Hello, What about these 2 new stubs: stubs/unix/texmfstart: #!/bin/sh script=$(dirname $0)/../../ruby/texmfstart.rb exec $script "$@" # (or exec ruby $script "$@") stubs/unix/texsync: #!/bin/sh texmfstart texsync.rb "$@" # (Or is texsync now obsolete and replaced by another script?) Cheers, P