\citep[see][]{jon90} --(see Jones et al., 1990)
\citep[see][chap. 2]{jon90} --(see Jones et al., 1990,
chap. 2)
I guess you could do that with
\def\citep[#1][#2][#3]{#1\ \citealt[#3], #2}
or something like that...
Guess it would be nice to have
thanks for the answer; unfortunately it does not work; it protests
about a runaway argument...
If somebody has a fix for this, please let me know as soon as possible
Pau
2009/1/29 J.A.J. Pater jajpa...@gmail.com:
\citep[see][]{jon90} --(see Jones et al., 1990)
Pau wrote:
thanks for the answer; unfortunately it does not work; it protests
about a runaway argument...
If somebody has a fix for this, please let me know as soon as possible
Another [] vs {} mixup. Correct usage is \citep[see][chap. 2][jon90]
Best wishes,
Taco
The wiki suggests to make a macro:
\def\onlinecite#1{\cite[left=,right=][#1]}
for inline citations.
However it says you can use this macro with: \onlinecite[myRef]
It works for me with: \onlinecite{myRef}
But not with \onlinecite[myRef] for in that case it produces:
Xx, myRef]
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009, J.A.J. Pater wrote:
I think I've got it.
The macro should be: \def\onlinecite[#1]{\cite[left=,right=][#1]}
- with [] around the first #1
now \onlinecite[myRef] works
You can remove the redunent [#1] from both sides.
\def\onlinecite{\cite[left=,right=]}
Aditya
nice!
I have defined this to \def\citealt{\cite[left=,right=]}
for the equivalent
what's the equivalent in ConTeXt of citep??
2009/1/29 Aditya Mahajan adit...@umich.edu:
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009, J.A.J. Pater wrote:
I think I've got it.
The macro should be:
On Thu, 29 Jan 2009, Pau wrote:
nice!
I have defined this to \def\citealt{\cite[left=,right=]}
for the equivalent
what's the equivalent in ConTeXt of citep??
What is \citep supposed to do?
Aditya
___
If your
