On Thu, 16 May 2019 12:48:30 +0200
Denis Maier wrote:
> (2) there is a clear, defined standard that can be followed.
>
> This is actually the easier question: A few standard styles
> immediately come to mind: MLA, Chicago 16th and 17 edition in its
> various variants (author-date,
On Thu, 16 May 2019 10:02:44 +0200
"Jan U. Hasecke" wrote:
> But as I collect my internet citations with zotero I always get a
> urldate for all internet entries. I think that giving the urldate is
> better than insert a publication year as nobody knows how long a
> website was present and when
On 16/05/2019 16:02, Jan U. Hasecke wrote:
> Am 16.05.19 um 16:12 schrieb nyssus:
>> Honestly, some way to use CSL files to style bibliography would be ideal
>> here, but that doesn't seem to currently exist
> Have a look at Pablos way to go from pandoc via xhtml to context:
>
>
That's good if
Very interesting project. I have a workflow where I produce ConTeXt sources
from markdown via pandoc. But using XML could be even better. Nevertheless,
this still leaves us with the problem that CSL support with pandoc-citeproc
has a few glitches (wrong disambiguation; ibids can be ambiguous, some
Am 16.05.19 um 16:12 schrieb nyssus:
> Honestly, some way to use CSL files to style bibliography would be ideal
> here, but that doesn't seem to currently exist
Have a look at Pablos way to go from pandoc via xhtml to context:
https://github.com/ousia/from-pandoc-to-context
Or a slightly
Well, currently not. But citeproc-rs, a CSL implementation written in Rust
is in the making. I don't know if there will be any progress in the near
future, but it should be possible to use this via lua bindings.
Am Do., 16. Mai 2019 um 16:12 Uhr schrieb nyssus <
rocksolidbrassba...@gmail.com>:
>
On 16/05/2019 11:48, Denis Maier wrote:
> This is more tricky. I do very much like what ConTeXt has to offer for
> typesetting finished works, but I currently would not use it for writing a
> larger work in the Humanities. For smaller pieces I would probably write in
> Markdown, use pandoc to
I am not the OP, but I'm very much interested in how referencing works with
ConTeXt so let me add to this.
> You can write your own style, or your own modified style.
Is the publications manual still up to date? Is there more recent
information available? How would I start writing my own
Hi Alan,
thanks a lot for these hints.
Am 16.05.19 um 02:05 schrieb Alan Braslau:
> On Wed, 15 May 2019 14:27:21 +0200
> "Jan U. Hasecke" wrote:
>
>> is there an option to eliminate the "unpublished" in aps bibliography?
>
> I suppose you mean the APS setup when NO date field is given
> ("to
On Wed, 15 May 2019 14:27:21 +0200
"Jan U. Hasecke" wrote:
> I understand that apa and aps are the only implemented styles. Is
> there any other style I can use?
You can write your own style, or your own modified style. Also, we can
implement more styles if (1) there is a need, and (2) there is
On Wed, 15 May 2019 14:27:21 +0200
"Jan U. Hasecke" wrote:
> is there an option to eliminate the "unpublished" in aps bibliography?
I suppose you mean the APS setup when NO date field is given
("to be published" for an article, "in press" for a book, and
"unpublished" otherwise)?
You can
Hi all,
is there an option to eliminate the "unpublished" in aps bibliography?
I understand that apa and aps are the only implemented styles. Is there
any other style I can use?
TIA
juh
___
If your question is of
12 matches
Mail list logo
