[NTG-context] Buffers vs. \def

2012-04-18 Thread Procházka Lukáš Ing . - Pontex s . r . o .
Hello, a question - I'm just curious: What is advantage (or maybe intension) of using buffers over \def? Compare: \def\BufA{This is buffer A.} \startbuffer[BufB] This is buffer B. \stopbuffer \starttext \BufA \getbuffer[BufB] \ifx\BufC\undefined No buffer C.\else\BufC\fi

Re: [NTG-context] Buffers vs. \def

2012-04-18 Thread Hans Hagen
On 18-4-2012 11:48, Procházka Lukáš Ing. - Pontex s. r. o. wrote: Hello, a question - I'm just curious: What is advantage (or maybe intension) of using buffers over \def? better test with \startlines test test \stoplines also, bufferes can be flushed verbatim, as tex, as ... while macros

Re: [NTG-context] Buffers vs. \def

2012-04-18 Thread Wolfgang Schuster
Am 18.04.2012 um 11:48 schrieb Procházka Lukáš Ing. - Pontex s. r. o.: Hello, a question - I'm just curious: What is advantage (or maybe intension) of using buffers over \def? Compare: \def\BufA{This is buffer A.} \startbuffer[BufB] This is buffer B. \stopbuffer