On 30-8-2011 05:53, Khaled Hosny wrote:
While at it, Hans, here is an updated copy of the file (adding yet
another stylistic set). Since I keep adding stylistic sets, should I
maintain the file and bundle it with XITS? So that users of texlive
would get updated file with new font releases
Hi,
There are two calligraphic shapes in math, calligraphic (e.g., \cal) and
script (e.g., \scr from RSFS). The default shape of \cal with xits is more
like RSFS \scr than \cal. Does xits also have a less stylistic variant for
calligraphic letters? If so, how can I select that?
Aditya
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 11:08:09PM -0400, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Hi,
There are two calligraphic shapes in math, calligraphic (e.g., \cal)
and script (e.g., \scr from RSFS). The default shape of \cal with
xits is more like RSFS \scr than \cal. Does xits also have a less
stylistic variant for
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 05:34:52AM +0200, Khaled Hosny wrote:
There are few other defined alternates in xits-math.lfg.
While at it, Hans, here is an updated copy of the file (adding yet
another stylistic set). Since I keep adding stylistic sets, should I
maintain the file and bundle it with
On Tue, 30 Aug 2011, Khaled Hosny wrote:
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 11:08:09PM -0400, Aditya Mahajan wrote:
Hi,
There are two calligraphic shapes in math, calligraphic (e.g., \cal)
and script (e.g., \scr from RSFS). The default shape of \cal with
xits is more like RSFS \scr than \cal. Does xits
